New York Frankfurter Company of California, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue et al
Filing
17
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/20/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
No. C 13-02230 SI
Related Case Nos. 13-02232, 13-02233
CATHERINE SCHOOP,
Plaintiff,
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR
FAILURE TO PROSECUTE
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendants.
/
14
Plaintiff Schoop filed this and related actions against defendants to quash summonses. On July
15
12, 2013, defendant filed a motion to dismiss and compel compliance with the summonses. The hearing
16
was set for August 30, 2013, and plaintiff’s opposition was due on July 26, 2013. Plaintiff did not file
17
an opposition, nor did plaintiff request an extension of time.
18
Accordingly, plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in writing no later than August
19
30, 2013, why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. Proc.
20
41(b). If plaintiff does not respond, this action will be dismissed without prejudice. The August 30,
21
2013 hearing date is VACATED.
22
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
25
Dated: August 12, 2013
26
27
28
SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?