Santiago v. CACH LLC et al

Filing 13

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 12 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 10 MOTION for Attorney Fees Motion for Award of Attorney's Fees and Costs filed by Susan Blush, CACH LLC. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on July 15, 2013. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/15/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 JUNE D. COLEMAN, CSBN 191890 jcoleman@kmtg.com DANIELLE R. TEETERS, CSBN 210056 dteeters@kmtg.com KRONICK, MOSKOVITZ, TIEDEMANN & GIRARD 400 Capitol Mall, 27th Floor Sacramento, CA 95814 Telephone: (916) 321-4500 Facsimile: (916) 321-4555 6 7 8 Attorneys for Defendants SUSAN BLUSH dba KENTWOOD LAW GROUP and CACH, LLC 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 12 13 ABDON SANTIAGO, Plaintiff, 14 15 16 CASE NO. 3:13-CV-02234-JST v. CACH LLC, SUSAN BLUSH d/b/a KENTWOOD LAW GROUP, 17 NOTICE OF CONTINUING HEARING DATE; STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE (N.D.L.R. 6-2, 6-3, 7-7; 7-11; 712) Defendants. Hearing Date: Proposed Hearing Date: Time: Courtroom: 18 19 20 August 15, 2013 Sept. 5, 2013 2:00 p.m. 9 – 19th Floor Hon. Jon S. Tigar 21 NOTICE 22 23 24 Pursuant to N,D. Local Rule 7-7(a), Plaintiff provides notice that the August 10, 2013 hearing date will be continued to September 5, 2013. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 25 26 27 Pursuant to N.D. Local Rules 6-2, 6-3, 7-7(d), 7-11, and 7-12, the parties request that the briefing schedule be extended to allow the parties to meet and 28 K RO NICK , M OSKOVITZ , T IEDEMANN & G IRAR D ATTOR NE YS A T L AW SACR AME NTO 1032888.1 13640.007 -1- 3:13-CV-02234-JST NOTICE OF CONTINUING HEARING DATE; STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE (N.D.L.R. 6-2, 7-7; 7-11; 7-12) 1 confer regarding resolution of this fee motion without judicial involvement. 2 Plaintiff and Defendants, by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby 3 stipulate as follows: 4 1. Opposition, if any, shall be served and filed by July 29, 2013. 5 2. Any reply to an opposition shall be served and filed by the moving 6 7 party not more than seven (7) days after the Opposition Brief is served and filed. Neither party has previously requested an extension related to the Motion for 8 Fees and Costs, or any other court deadlines. The extension of the briefing 9 schedule will have no impact on any other deadlines in this matter. 10 Accordingly, the parties stipulate and request that the briefing schedule be extended to 11 July 29, 2013, for the Opposition Brief, and the Reply Brief would be filed and served not more 12 than seven (7) days after the Opposition Brief is served and filed. 13 14 Dated: July 15, 2013 15 THE BERG LAW GROUP By: /s/ Irving L. Berg Irving L. Berg Attorneys for Plaintiff ABDON SANTIAGO 16 17 18 19 Dated: July 15, 2013 20 By: /s/ June D. Coleman June D. Coleman Danielle R. Teeters Attorneys for Defendants SUSAN BLUSH dba KENTWOOD LAW GROUP and CACH, LLC 21 22 23 24 KRONICK, MOSKOVITZ, TIEDEMANN & GIRARD A Law Corporation PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 Dated: July 15, 2013 27 28 K RO NICK , M OSKOVITZ , T IEDEMANN & G IRAR D ATTOR NE YS A T L AW SACR AME NTO 1032888.1 13640.007 _______________________________________ Honorable Jon S. Tigar U.S. District Court Judge for the Northern District of California -2- 3:13-CV-02234-JST NOTICE OF CONTINUING HEARING DATE; STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE (N.D.L.R. 6-2, 7-7; 7-11; 7-12)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?