Santiago v. CACH LLC et al

Filing 13

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 12 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 10 MOTION for Attorney Fees Motion for Award of Attorney's Fees and Costs filed by Susan Blush, CACH LLC. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on July 15, 2013. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/15/2013)

1
2
3
4
5

JUNE D. COLEMAN, CSBN 191890
[e-mail]
DANIELLE R. TEETERS, CSBN 210056
[e-mail]
KRONICK, MOSKOVITZ, TIEDEMANN &
GIRARD
400 Capitol Mall, 27th Floor
Sacramento, CA 95814
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

6
7
8

Attorneys for Defendants
SUSAN BLUSH dba KENTWOOD LAW GROUP
and CACH, LLC

9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

12
13

ABDON SANTIAGO,
Plaintiff,

14
15
16

CASE NO. 3:13-CV-02234-JST

v.
CACH LLC, SUSAN BLUSH d/b/a
KENTWOOD LAW GROUP,

17

NOTICE OF CONTINUING HEARING
DATE; STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING
SCHEDULE ON MOTION FOR
ATTORNEY’S FEES AND BRIEFING
SCHEDULE (N.D.L.R. 6-2, 6-3, 7-7; 7-11; 712)

Defendants.
Hearing Date:
Proposed Hearing Date:
Time:
Courtroom:

18
19
20

August 15, 2013
Sept. 5, 2013
2:00 p.m.
9 – 19th Floor
Hon. Jon S. Tigar

21

NOTICE

22
23
24

Pursuant to N,D. Local Rule 7-7(a), Plaintiff provides notice that the August
10, 2013 hearing date will be continued to September 5, 2013.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

25
26
27

Pursuant to N.D. Local Rules 6-2, 6-3, 7-7(d), 7-11, and 7-12, the parties
request that the briefing schedule be extended to allow the parties to meet and

28
K RO NICK ,
M OSKOVITZ ,
T IEDEMANN &
G IRAR D
ATTOR NE YS A T L AW
SACR AME NTO

1032888.1 13640.007

-1-

3:13-CV-02234-JST

NOTICE OF CONTINUING HEARING DATE; STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE
ON MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE (N.D.L.R. 6-2, 7-7; 7-11; 7-12)

1

confer regarding resolution of this fee motion without judicial involvement.

2

Plaintiff and Defendants, by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby

3

stipulate as follows:

4

1.

Opposition, if any, shall be served and filed by July 29, 2013.

5

2.

Any reply to an opposition shall be served and filed by the moving

6
7

party not more than seven (7) days after the Opposition Brief is served and filed.
Neither party has previously requested an extension related to the Motion for

8

Fees and Costs, or any other court deadlines. The extension of the briefing

9

schedule will have no impact on any other deadlines in this matter.

10

Accordingly, the parties stipulate and request that the briefing schedule be extended to

11

July 29, 2013, for the Opposition Brief, and the Reply Brief would be filed and served not more

12

than seven (7) days after the Opposition Brief is served and filed.

13
14

Dated: July 15, 2013

15

THE BERG LAW GROUP
By: /s/ Irving L. Berg
Irving L. Berg
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ABDON SANTIAGO

16
17
18
19

Dated: July 15, 2013

20

By: /s/ June D. Coleman
June D. Coleman
Danielle R. Teeters
Attorneys for Defendants
SUSAN BLUSH dba KENTWOOD LAW GROUP
and CACH, LLC

21
22
23
24

KRONICK, MOSKOVITZ, TIEDEMANN & GIRARD
A Law Corporation

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

25
26

Dated: July 15, 2013

27
28
K RO NICK ,
M OSKOVITZ ,
T IEDEMANN &
G IRAR D
ATTOR NE YS A T L AW
SACR AME NTO

1032888.1 13640.007

_______________________________________
Honorable Jon S. Tigar
U.S. District Court Judge for the Northern District of
California
-2-

3:13-CV-02234-JST

NOTICE OF CONTINUING HEARING DATE; STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE
ON MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE (N.D.L.R. 6-2, 7-7; 7-11; 7-12)