Everett v. Fusionstorm, Inc.
Filing
20
ORDER re 19 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER TO DISMISS ACTION SUBJECT TO SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT filed by Fusionstorm, Inc.. Signed by Judge Alsup on 9/25/2013. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/25/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
LAURIE EVERETT, a California resident,
individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated,
12
13
14
15
16
Plaintiff,
No. C 13-02238 WHA
ORDER RE STIPULATION TO
DISMISS ACTION
v.
FUSIONSTORM, INC., a Delaware
corporation; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive,
Defendant.
/
17
18
19
The Court has received the parties’ stipulation and proposed order to dismiss this action
20
subject to the settlement agreement with plaintiff and without prejudice to claims of the putative
21
class (Dkt. No. 19). This matter involves a putative class action. From experience, the Court is
22
concerned that the leverage of a potential class proceeding is being used to obtain a
23
disproportionate settlement in plaintiff’s or counsel’s favor without any benefit to the putative
24
class. The Court is further concerned that a settlement was negotiated in violation to the order
25
and notice dated July 25, 2013 at paragraph ten (Dkt. No. 11).
26
Before approval of the requested dismissal, counsel shall lodge a copy of the final written
27
settlement agreement between the parties. Counsel shall also explain (1) whether plaintiff’s
28
counsel will receive any fees, expenses, or other compensation as a result of the settlement
agreement; (2) why this settlement agreement was negotiated in violation of the order and notice;
1
and (3) whether plaintiff’s counsel are trying to dismiss this action in order to re-file the matter
2
in a different jurisdiction. These explanations, as well as the copy of the settlement agreement,
3
are due by 6:00 PM ON SEPTEMBER 25. The parties should be prepared to discuss the above at
4
the initial case management conference at 11:00 AM ON SEPTEMBER 26.
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
8
Dated: September 25, 2013.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?