Sharma et al v. BMW of North America LLC

Filing 187

ORDER CONTINUING JUNE 30, 2017 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND STAY PENDING SETTLEMENT. The stay is continued, pending the settlement approval process before Judge Forrest. The Case Management Conference is continued from June 30, 2017, to September 29, 2017. The parties shall jointly submit a Case Management Statement no later than September 22, 2017. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on June 23, 2017. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/23/2017)

Download PDF
1 7 William A. Kershaw (State Bar No. 057486) Email: wkershaw@kcrlegal.com Stuart C. Talley (State Bar No. 180374) Email: stalley@kcrlegal.com Ian J. Barlow (State Bar No. 262213) Email: ibarlow@kcrlegal.com KERSHAW, COOK & TALLEY PC 401 Watt Avenue Sacramento, California 95864 Telephone: (916) 779-7000 Facsimile: (916) 721-2501 8 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 2 3 4 5 6 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 13 14 15 MONITA SHARMA and ERIC ANDERSON, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, 16 17 18 Plaintiffs, v. BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, Case No. 3:13-cv-02274-MMC (KAW) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING JUNE 30, 2017 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND TO STAY CASE PENDING SETTLEMENT Honorable Maxine M. Chesney 19 20 Defendant. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CMC AND TO STAY CASE PENDING SETTLEMENT 1 Pursuant to Northern District of California Civil Local Rule 7-12, Plaintiff Eric Anderson 2 (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant BMW of North America, LLC (“BMW NA” or “Defendant”), by and 3 through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate as follows: 4 STIPULATION 5 WHEREAS, the parties in Catalano v. BMW of North America, LLC, et al., Case No. 1:15- 6 cv-04889, pending before Honorable Katherine B. Forrest in the United States District Court for the 7 Southern District of New York (“Catalano Action”) have entered into a settlement agreement 8 (“Settlement”) that resolves both the Catalano Action and this case (“Sharma Action”); 9 WHEREAS, on December 5, 2016, this Court entered on Order staying the Sharma Action 10 (“Order Staying Case”) (Dkt. No. 185) pursuant to the parties’ Stipulation to Stay Case Pending 11 Settlement (Dkt. No. 184); 12 13 WHEREAS, on February 28, 2017, Judge Forrest entered an Order Granting Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement (Catalano Dkt. No. 129); 14 WHEREAS, notice of the proposed Settlement has been provided by U.S. Mail and 15 publication via a Settlement website to the Settlement Class, consisting of: all persons or entities in 16 the United States and Puerto Rico who currently own or lease, or previously owned or leased, a 17 model year 2004 to 2010 U.S. specification BMW 5 Series (E60 and E61) vehicle; 18 WHEREAS, the deadline for plaintiff’s counsel in the Catalano Action to move for final 19 approval of the proposed Settlement is June 28, 2017 and the hearing on plaintiff’s motion for final 20 approval is scheduled for July 28, 2017; 21 22 WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s counsel in this case also represent the plaintiff and putative class in the Catalano Action; 23 WHEREAS, in light of the ongoing proceedings to approve the proposed Settlement 24 resolving this case and the Catalano Action, further litigation of this action would not be an 25 efficient use of the parties’ or this Court’s resources; 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CMC AND TO STAY CASE PENDING SETTLEMENT 1 WHEREAS, pursuant to the Court’s Order Staying Case, in the event the proposed 2 Settlement has not yet been finally approved, the parties are required to submit a joint Case 3 Management Statement no later than June 23, 2017 in advance of the existing Case Management 4 Conference on June 30, 2017, consistent with this Court’s November 14, 2016 Order Re: Case 5 Management Conference (Dkt. No. 183); and 6 7 8 9 10 WHEREAS, the parties hereby stipulate and agree to continue the stay in this case and all case management and related deadlines. NOW, THEREFORE, undersigned counsel for the parties, having met and conferred and good cause appearing, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 1. The above-captioned case and all case management and related deadlines should 11 continue to be stayed pending final approval of the Settlement to this action and the Catalano Action 12 and the settlement approval process before Judge Forrest; and 13 2. The parties further agree and stipulate that the existing Case Management 14 Conference on June 30, 2017 should be continued to September 29, 2017, and that the parties will 15 jointly submit a Case Management Statement no later than September 22, 2017. 16 17 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED. 18 19 Dated: June 22, 2017. KERSHAW, COOK & TALLEY PC 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 By: /s/ Ian J. Barlow IAN J. BARLOW William A. Kershaw Stuart C. Talley 401 Watt Avenue Sacramento, California 95864 Telephone: (916) 779-7000 Attorneys for Plaintiff and the putative Class 27 28 3 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CMC AND TO STAY CASE PENDING SETTLEMENT 1 Dated: June 22, 2017. SQUIRE PATTON BOGGS (US) LLP 2 3 By: 4 5 /s/ Aengus H. Carr AENGUS H. CARR 7 Eric J. Knapp 275 Battery Street, Suite 2600 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 954-0200 8 Attorneys for Defendant 6 9 10 11 Civil L.R. 5-1(i) Certification The filing attorney hereby certifies that concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from each of the other signatories, in full accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i). 12 13 [PROPOSED] ORDER 14 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 15 16 17 June 23, 2017 DATED: ______________________ _______________________________ ______________________________ ____ __ _ _ _ Honorable Maxine M. Chesney Honorable n ra M SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE SENIOR NI I UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CMC AND TO STAY CASE PENDING SETTLEMENT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?