Sharma et al v. BMW of North America LLC

Filing 32

ORDER DENYING AGREED ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITS; EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND TO STRIKE. The Court extends the deadline for plaintiffs to file their opposition briefs from September 27, 2013 to October 1, 2013, and extends the deadline for defendant to file their replies from October 11, 2013 to October 15, 2013. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 26, 2013.(mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/26/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 11 MONITA SHARMA, et al., Plaintiffs, 12 13 14 15 No. C-13-2274 MMC ORDER DENYING AGREED ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITS; EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND TO STRIKE v. BWM OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC,, Defendant. / 16 17 Before the Court is the parties’ “Agreed Administrative Motion, Stipulation and 18 [Proposed] Order,” filed September 24, 2013, “to Exceed Page Limits for Oppositions and 19 Replies on BWM of North America, LLC’s Motions to Dismiss and Strike Set for Hearing on 20 November 1, 2013.” Having read and considered the parties’ administrative motion, the 21 Court rules as follows. 22 As set forth in the administrative motion, defendant has filed a motion to dismiss and 23 a motion to strike. The motion to dismiss is twenty pages in length, and the motion to strike 24 is sixteen pages in length. In their pending administrative motion, the parties seek leave for 25 plaintiffs to file a thirty-page opposition to each motion, and for defendant to file a twenty- 26 page reply to each opposition. The parties fail, however, to identify any good cause for 27 exceeding the pages limits set forth in the Local Rules of this District, see Civil L.R. 7-3, 28 and no such cause is evident from the face of defendant’s motions. 1 2 3 Accordingly, the administrative motion is hereby DENIED, and the parties are DIRECTED to comply with the page limits set forth in Civil Local Rule 7-3. Finally, because plaintiffs may have relied on the stipulation in preparing their 4 opposition, the Court hereby EXTENDS the deadline for plaintiffs to file their opposition 5 briefs from September 27, 2013 to October 1, 2013, and EXTENDS the deadline for 6 defendant to file their replies from October 11, 2013 to October 15, 2013. 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 Dated: September 26, 2013 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?