Sharma et al v. BMW of North America LLC
Filing
32
ORDER DENYING AGREED ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITS; EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND TO STRIKE. The Court extends the deadline for plaintiffs to file their opposition briefs from September 27, 2013 to October 1, 2013, and extends the deadline for defendant to file their replies from October 11, 2013 to October 15, 2013. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 26, 2013.(mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/26/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
11
MONITA SHARMA, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
12
13
14
15
No. C-13-2274 MMC
ORDER DENYING AGREED
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO EXCEED
PAGE LIMITS; EXTENDING BRIEFING
SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANTS’
MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND TO STRIKE
v.
BWM OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC,,
Defendant.
/
16
17
Before the Court is the parties’ “Agreed Administrative Motion, Stipulation and
18
[Proposed] Order,” filed September 24, 2013, “to Exceed Page Limits for Oppositions and
19
Replies on BWM of North America, LLC’s Motions to Dismiss and Strike Set for Hearing on
20
November 1, 2013.” Having read and considered the parties’ administrative motion, the
21
Court rules as follows.
22
As set forth in the administrative motion, defendant has filed a motion to dismiss and
23
a motion to strike. The motion to dismiss is twenty pages in length, and the motion to strike
24
is sixteen pages in length. In their pending administrative motion, the parties seek leave for
25
plaintiffs to file a thirty-page opposition to each motion, and for defendant to file a twenty-
26
page reply to each opposition. The parties fail, however, to identify any good cause for
27
exceeding the pages limits set forth in the Local Rules of this District, see Civil L.R. 7-3,
28
and no such cause is evident from the face of defendant’s motions.
1
2
3
Accordingly, the administrative motion is hereby DENIED, and the parties are
DIRECTED to comply with the page limits set forth in Civil Local Rule 7-3.
Finally, because plaintiffs may have relied on the stipulation in preparing their
4
opposition, the Court hereby EXTENDS the deadline for plaintiffs to file their opposition
5
briefs from September 27, 2013 to October 1, 2013, and EXTENDS the deadline for
6
defendant to file their replies from October 11, 2013 to October 15, 2013.
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
9
Dated: September 26, 2013
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?