Van de Streek v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Filing
25
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY OF DOCUMENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL LOCAL RULES AND THE COURT'S STANDING ORDERS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 9, 2013. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/9/2013)
Van de Streek v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Doc. 25
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
11
LUEREAN VAN DE STREEK,
Plaintiffs,
12
13
14
15
16
No. C-13-2282 MMC
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO
SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY OF
DOCUMENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH
CIVIL LOCAL RULES AND THE
COURT’S STANDING ORDERS
v.
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER
CORPORATION,
Defendant.
/
17
18
On July 31, 2013, plaintiff electronically filed her First Amended Complaint. Plaintiff
19
has violated the Civil Local Rules of this District and the Court’s Standing Orders, however,
20
by failing “to provide for chambers a paper copy of each document that is electronically filed
21
. . . marked ‘Chambers Copy’.” See Civil L.R. 5-1(e)(7); see also Standing Orders For Civil
22
Cases Assigned to The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney ¶ 2.
23
Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to comply with Civil Local Rule 5-1(e)(7) and the
24
Court’s Standing Orders by immediately submitting a chambers copy of the above-
25
referenced document. Plaintiff is hereby advised that if she fails in the future to comply
26
with the Court’s Standing Orders to provide a chambers copy of each electronically-filed
27
document, the Court may impose sanctions, including, but not limited to, striking from the
28
record any electronically-filed document of which a chambers copy has not been timely
Dockets.Justia.com
1
2
provided to the Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
4
Dated: August 9, 2013
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?