Van de Streek v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Filing
44
ORDER REFERRING TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL AND MOTION FOR SANCTIONS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on January 27, 2014. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/27/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
11
LUEREAN VAN DE STREEK,
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
No. C 13-2282 MMC
ORDER REFERRING TO MAGISTRATE
JUDGE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO
COMPEL AND MOTION FOR
SANCTIONS
v.
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER
CORPORATION, dba AMTRAK,
15
Defendant.
16
/
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 72-1, plaintiff’s Motion to Compel, filed January 24,
2014, plaintiff’s Motion for Sanctions, filed January 24, 2014, and all further discovery
matters, are hereby REFERRED to a Magistrate Judge to be heard and considered at the
convenience of the assigned Magistrate Judge’s calendar.
After the parties have met and conferred, see Civil L.R. 37-1, the parties shall
prepare a joint letter of not more than 8 pages explaining the dispute; up to 12 pages of
attachments may be added. The joint letter must be electronically filed under the Civil
Events category of “Motions and Related Filings > Motions - General > Discovery Letter
Brief.” The Magistrate Judge to whom the matter is assigned will advise the parties as to
how that Magistrate Judge intends to proceed. The Magistrate Judge may issue a ruling,
order more formal briefing, or set a telephone conference or a hearing.
1
2
The parties will be advised of the date, time and place of the next appearance, if
any, by notice from the assigned Magistrate Judge’s chambers.
3
The March 7, 2014 hearing noticed before the undersigned is VACATED.
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
Dated: January 27, 2014
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?