Raimondo et al v. Federal Bureau of Investigation

Filing 62

Amended ORDER granting 60 Proposed Schedule filed by Eric Anthony Garris, Dennis Joseph Raimondo. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 7/17/2015. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/17/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP
THOMAS V. LORAN III #95255
[e-mail]
ANDREW BLUTH #232387
[e-mail]
LAURA C. HURTADO #267044
[e-mail]
Four Embarcadero Center, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

12

AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION
FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA
JULIA HARUMI MASS #189649
[e-mail]
LINDA LYE
[e-mail]
39 Drumm Street
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

13

[Additional Parties and Counsel on Signature Page]

8
9
10
11

14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

17
18
19

DENNIS JOSEPH RAIMONDO (a.k.a.
JUSTIN RAIMONDO), an individual, and
ERIC ANTHONY GARRIS, an individual,

20
21
22

Plaintiffs,
vs.
FEDERAL BUREAU OF
INVESTIGATION,

23
Defendant.
24

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. C-13-02295 JSC
JOINT PROPOSED SCHEDULING
ORDER AND [PROPOSED]
SCHEDULING ORDER REGARDING
MOTION TO QUASH AND MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

25
26
27
28
Joint Proposed Scheduling Order and
[Proposed] Scheduling Order
Case No. 13-02295-JSC

1

Pursuant to the Minute Order entered on July 9, 2015 (Dkt. No. 59), the parties

2

propose the following dates in connection with briefing on Defendant Federal Bureau of

3

Investigation’s (“Defendant”) anticipated motion to quash and the parties’ anticipated cross

4

motions for summary judgment:

5



July 23, 2015:

Defendant files motion to quash

6



August 13:

Plaintiffs Dennis Joseph Raimondo and Eric Anthony Garris
(collectively, “Plaintiffs”) file opposition to motion to quash

7
8



August 27:

Defendant files reply in support of motion to quash

9



September 10:

Hearing on motion to quash

10



November 12:

Defendant files motion for summary judgment

11



December 17:

Plaintiffs file opposition to Defendant’s motion for summary

12
13

judgment and cross motion for summary judgment


January 28, 2016: Defendant files reply in support of motion for summary judgment
and opposition to Plaintiffs’ cross motion for summary judgment

14
15



February 11:

16

Plaintiffs file reply in support of Plaintiffs’ cross motion for
summary judgment

17



18

Dated: July 16, 2015.

February 25:

Hearing on cross motions for summary judgment

19
20
21
22

JULIA HARUMI MASS
LINDA LYE
ACLU CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION
OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA
39 Drumm Street
San Francisco, California 94111

23
24
25
26
27
28
-1-

Joint Proposed Scheduling Order and
[Proposed] Scheduling Order
Case No. 13-02295-JSC

PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP
THOMAS V. LORAN III
ANDREW BLUTH
LAURA C. HURTADO
Four Embarcadero Center, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, California 94111

1
2
3
4

By

5
6

/s/ Laura C. Hurtado
Laura C. Hurtado
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

MELINDA HAAG #132612
United States Attorney
ALEX G. TSE #1523548
Chief, Civil Division
JENNIFER S WANG #233155
Assistant United States Attorney
450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055
San Francisco, California 94102-3495
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

7
8
9
10
11
12
13

By

14

/s/ Jennifer S Wang
Jennifer S Wang
Attorneys for Federal Defendant

15
16
17

ATTESTATION OF CONCURRENCE IN FILING

18

In accordance with N.D. Cal. Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that I have

19
20
21
22
23
24

obtained the concurrence of all other signatories in the filing of this document.
Dated: July 16, 2015.
PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP
THOMAS V. LORAN III
ANDREW BLUTH
LAURA C. HURTADO
Four Embarcadero Center, 22nd Floor
Post Office Box 2824
San Francisco, CA 94126-2824

25
By
26

/s/ Laura C. Hurtado
Laura C. Hurtado
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

27
28
-2-

Joint Proposed Scheduling Order and
[Proposed] Scheduling Order
Case No. 13-02295-JSC

AMENDED

1

[PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO QUASH

2

AND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

3

Pursuant to the parties Joint Proposed Scheduling Order and good cause having

4

been shown, the Court orders the following briefing scheduling:

5



July 23, 2015:

Defendant files motion to quash

6



August 13:

Plaintiffs Dennis Joseph Raimondo and Eric Anthony Garris
(collectively, “Plaintiffs”) file opposition to motion to quash

7
8



August 27:

Defendant files reply in support of motion to quash

9



September 10:

Hearing on motion to quash

10



November 12:

Defendant files motion for summary judgment

11



December 17:

Plaintiffs file opposition to Defendant’s motion for summary

12
13

judgment and cross motion for summary judgment


January 28, 2016: Defendant files reply in support of motion for summary judgment
and opposition to Plaintiffs’ cross motion for summary judgment

14
15



16
17

February 11:
March 3, 2016



February 25:

Plaintiffs file reply in support of Plaintiffs’ cross motion for
summary judgment
Hearing on cross motions for summary judgment

18
Dated: July 17, 2015
19

____________________________________
JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY
United States Magistrate Judge

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-

Joint Proposed Scheduling Order and
[Proposed] Scheduling Order
Case No. 13-02295-JSC