Raimondo et al v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
Filing
68
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley granting 63 Motion for Protective Order (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/11/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
DENNIS JOSEPH RAIMONDO, et al.,
Case No. 13-cv-02295-JSC
Plaintiffs,
10
ORDER RE: DEFENDANT’S MOTION
FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
v.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
FEDERAL BUREAU OF
INVESTIGATION,
13
Defendant.
Re: Dkt. No. 63
14
15
Defendant’s Motion for a Protective Order seeking to quash deposition subpoenas issued
16
to two former FBI employees came before the Court for hearing on September 10, 2015. (Dkt.
17
No. 63.) For the reasons stated on the record, the motion is GRANTED without prejudice to
18
Plaintiffs’ renewal of their request for additional targeted discovery following receipt of
19
Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment.
20
In light of this ruling, the Court modifies the briefing schedule on the forthcoming motions
21
for summary judgment as follows:
22
November 12, 2015:
Defendant files motion for summary judgment.
23
November 20, 2015:
Plaintiffs notify Defendant of whether they desire to obtain
additional targeted discovery. Parties should meet and
24
confer thereafter.
25
26
27
28
December 1, 2015:
Plaintiffs forward Defendant their portion of a joint
discovery letter brief regarding the additional discovery
sought.
1
December 10, 2015:
Parties file their joint discovery letter brief.
2
December 17, 2015:
Hearing on Plaintiffs’ request for additional discovery at
9:00 a.m.
3
4
If following the filing of Defendant’s motion for summary judgment the parties agree on
5
additional discovery, but believe a modification of the schedule is needed, they may stipulate to an
6
amended schedule.
7
8
9
If upon review of Defendant’s motion for summary judgment, Plaintiffs do not believe that
further discovery is necessary, the previously established briefing schedule shall apply:
December 17, 2015:
judgment and cross motion for summary judgment.
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
January 28, 2016:
summary judgment.
13
February 11, 2016:
17
18
19
Plaintiffs file reply in support of Plaintiffs’ cross motion for
summary judgment.
15
16
Defendant files reply in support of motion for summary
judgment and opposition to Plaintiffs’ cross motion for
12
14
Plaintiffs file opposition to Defendant’s motion for summary
March 3, 2016:
Hearing on cross motions for summary judgment.
This Order disposes of Docket No. 63
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 11, 2015
20
________________________
JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY
United States Magistrate Judge
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?