Shade v. Anderson et al

Filing 23

ORDER DENYING 21 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on July 8, 2013. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/8/2013) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/8/2013: # 1 Certificate of Service) (tlS, COURT STAFF).

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
ROSS SHADE,

No. C 13-2303 MMC

For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10
Plaintiff,
11
12
13

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

v.
RICHARD E. ANDERSON, et al.,
Defendants.

/

14
15

Before the Court is plaintiff’s “Request for Reconsideration,” filed July 1, 2013, by

16

which motion plaintiff requests the Court reconsider its order dismissing the above-titled

17

action. (See Order filed June 17, 2013.) Plaintiff fails, however, to make any showing as to

18

the requisite grounds for such relief. See Fed. Rule. Civ. P. 60(b) (setting forth grounds for

19

relief from final judgment). In particular, plaintiff essentially repeats the factual allegations

20

made in his complaint and makes reference to an additional statute, 42 U.S.C. § 1985. To

21

the extent plaintiff repeats his factual allegations, the Court fully considered those

22

allegations in its order of dismissal; to the extent plaintiff now seeks to rely on § 1985, such

23

additional citation is unavailing as the events on which the complaint is based do not, and

24

could not, support a claim under said statute.

25

Accordingly, plaintiff’s motion is hereby DENIED.

26

IT IS SO ORDERED.

27
Dated: July 8, 2013
28

MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge