Paramo v. Boral Stone Products LLC

Filing 21

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE CASE WITH PREJUDICE 20 . Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 1/24/2014. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/24/2014)

1
2
3
4
5

Michael H. Kim, Esq. (SBN: 200792)
Law Firm Of Michael H. Kim
A Professional Corporation
475 El Camino Real, Suite 309
Millbrae, CA 94030
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorney For Plaintiff
Leovardo Paramo

6
7
8
9
10
11

LATHROP & GAGE, LLP
Jack Rowe, Esq. (Bar Nos. KS Fed. Dist.
Ct. 70005/ MO 22996/ MO Fed. Dist. Ct.
ED 22966MO)
Lauren J. Katunich (SBN: 227599)
1888 Century Park East, Suite 1000
Los Angeles, CA 90067-1623
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 310-789-4601
Attorneys for Defendant
Boral Stone Products LLC

12
13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15
16

LEOVARDO PARAMO,
Plaintiff,

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

vs.
BORAL STONE PRODUCTS LLC,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. CV 13-2344 NC
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH
PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED] ORDER

26
27
28

The parties, plaintiff Leovardo Paramo (“plaintiff”), and defendant Boral Stone
Products LLC (“defendant”), completed mediation on January 9, 2013 and have reached
-1STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED] ORDER
(CASE NO. CV 13-2344-NC)

1

agreement. Accordingly, it is HEREBY STIPULATED through counsel that the above-

2

captioned action be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of

3

Civil Procedure, with each party to bear and pay his or its own costs and attorneys’ fees.

4
5

IT IS STIPULATED.

6

Dated: January 23, 2014

LATHROP & GAGE, LLP

7
8

By: /S/ Lauren J. Katunich
Lauren J. Katunich
Attorneys for Defendant
BORAL STONE PRODUCTS LLC

9
10
11
12
13
14

Dated: January 23, 2014

LAW FIRM OF MICHAEL H. KIM

15
16

By: /S/ Michael H. Kim
Michael H. Kim
Attorneys for Plaintiff LEOVARDO PARAMO

17
18
19

28

LI

ER

H

27

The Hon. Nathanael Cousins
. Cousins
thanael M
Judge Na

RT

26

TED

NO

25

GRAN

-2-

R NIA

S
24

UNIT
ED

23

Dated: __________________
January 24, 2014

RT
U
O

22

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

FO

IT IS SO ORDERED.

21

A

20

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED] ORDER
(CASE NO. CV 13-2344-NC)