Oregon Mutual Insurance Company v. Homeward Residential, Inc. et al

Filing 54

ORDER VACATING MOTION HEARING re 36 MOTION to Deposit Funds filed by Oregon Mutual Insurance Company, 38 MOTION for Default Judgment by the Court as to Defendant Ben Pattillo filed by Oregon Mutual Insurance Company. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on September 11, 2013. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/11/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 OREGON MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, 7 8 9 10 Case No. 13-cv-02359-JST ORDER VACATING MOTION HEARING v. HOMEWARD RESIDENTIAL, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 36, 38 Defendants. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 Before the Court is Oregon Mutual Insurance Company's Motion to Deposit Funds and 13 Application for Entry of Default Judgment Against Defendant Ben Pattillo. Dkt. Nos. 36 & 38. 14 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court finds that 15 the parties’ briefs have thoroughly addressed the issues, rendering the matter suitable for 16 disposition without oral argument. The hearing on this matter, currently scheduled for September 17 19, 2013, is hereby VACATED. 18 However, if any party advises the Court in writing by no later than two days from the date 19 of this Order that most or all of the argument for its side will be conducted by a lawyer who has 20 been licensed to practice law for four or fewer years, and who has not previously presented 21 argument before this Court, then the Court will reschedule the hearing at a time that is convenient 22 to all parties in order to provide that opportunity. Any such notice should reflect the date or dates 23 on which the parties are available for the hearing. 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 11, 2013 ______________________________________ JON S. TIGAR United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?