Titus v. City and County of San Francisco et al

Filing 39

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 38 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re Plaintiff's Amended Complaint filed by LaVernon Titus. Motion terminated: 32 First MOTION to Amend/Correct Notice of Motion to Amend filed by LaVernon Titus. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on August 26, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/26/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

William R. Hopkins, State Bar #170122
LAW OFFICE WILLIAM R HOPKINS
1 Blackfield Drive, Suite 344
Tiburon, CA 94920
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
E-Mail:
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
LaVERNON TITUS
DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669
City Attorney
CHERYL ADAMS, State Bar #164194
Chief Trial Deputy
ELIZABETH PEDERSON, State Bar #288184
Deputy City Attorney
Fox Plaza
1390 Market Street, 6th Floor
San Francisco, California 94102-5408
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
E-Mail:
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO,
OFFICER ANDREW JOHNSON AND
CAPTAIN ERIC VINTERO

15
16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

17

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

18

LaVERNON TITUS,

19

Plaintiff,

20

vs.

21
22
23
24

Case No. C13-02401 JST
STIPULATION RE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT (Dkt. Nos.
32-34); [PROPOSED] ORDER

City and County of San Francisco, a municipal
corporation; Police Officer Start No. 700,
Police Officer, Badge no. 161, San Francisco
Police Department, in their individual and
official capacities and DOES 1 –through 20,
inclusive,
Defendants.

25
26
27
28
Stipulation Re Request for Leave to Amend Complaint
CASE NO. C13-02401 JST

1

c:\users\bill\documents\2013 plan\titus\amended file\joint
stipulation re amended complaint 3 13 cv 02401.docx

1

This matter is presently set on September 25, 2014 for hearing on Plaintiff’s motion to file an

2

amended complaint (Dkt. Nos. 32-34). Defendants opposed this motion on the grounds of prejudice

3

due to the possibility of re-opening discovery. (Dkt. No. 37.)

4

The parties have met and conferred and agreed to the following:

5

Defendants agree to withdraw their objection to the filing of Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint as

6

presented as an attachment to Plaintiff’s motion (Dkt. No. 34-1).

7

Plaintiff agrees not to seek to reopen either fact or expert discovery in this case.

8

Both parties agree that the filing of the amended complaint (Dkt. No. 34-1) will not affect the

9
10
11

deadlines set by Judge Tigar in his scheduling order (Dkt. No. 23).
SO STIPULATED.
Dated: August 25, 2014

12

LAW OFFICE WILLIAM R HOPKINS

13

By:

14

WILLIAM R. HOPKINS

15

Attorneys for Plaintiff
LaVERNON TITUS

16
17

Dated: August 25, 2014

18

DENNIS J. HERRERA
City Attorney
CHERYL ADAMS
Chief Trial Deputy
ELIZABETH PEDERSON
Deputy City Attorney

19
20
21
22
23
24
25

By:
ELIZABETH PEDERSON
Attorneys for Defendants
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO,
OFFICER ANDREW JOHNSON AND
CAPTAIN ERIC VINTERO

26
27
28
Stipulation Re Request for Leave to Amend Complaint
CASE NO. C13-02401 JST

2

c:\users\bill\documents\2013 plan\titus\amended file\joint
stipulation re amended complaint 3 13 cv 02401.docx

[PROPOSED] ORDER

1
2

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
The Court grants leave to Plaintiff to file his amended complaint (Dkt. No. 34-1) by August 29,
4
2014. Defendants shall answer such amended complaint by September 2, 2014. All dates in the
5
original scheduling order (Dkt. No. 23) will remain in place. Fact and expert discovery will remain
6
closed.
7

S

ER

14

R NIA
FO

. Ti ga r

LI

nS
J u d ge J o

H

13

RT

12

HONORABLE JON S. TIGAR

NO

11

D

RDERE
IS SO O
IT

A

10

UNIT
ED

DATED: August 26, 2014
9

RT
U
O

8

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

N

D IS T IC T
R

OF

C

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stipulation Re Request for Leave to Amend Complaint
CASE NO. C13-02401 JST

3

c:\users\bill\documents\2013 plan\titus\amended file\joint
stipulation re amended complaint 3 13 cv 02401.docx