Titus v. City and County of San Francisco et al

Filing 54

ORDER VACATING MOTION HEARING re 42 MOTION for Summary Judgment DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed by Eric Vintero, City and County of San Francisco, Andrew Johnson. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on October 27, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/27/2014)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

LAVERNON TITUS,

Case No. 13-cv-02401-JST

Plaintiff,
8
v.
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO, et al.,

ORDER VACATING MOTION
HEARING
Re: Dkt. No. 42

Defendants.

12
13

Before the Court is Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. Dkt. No. 42. Pursuant to

14

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court finds that the matter

15

is suitable for disposition without oral argument. The hearing on this matter, currently scheduled

16

for November 6, 2014, is hereby VACATED.

17

However, if any party advises the Court in writing by no later than two days from the date

18

of this Order that most or all of the argument for its side will be conducted by a lawyer who has

19

been licensed to practice law for four or fewer years, and who has not previously presented

20

argument before this Court, then the Court will reschedule the hearing at a time that is convenient

21

to all parties in order to provide that opportunity. Counsel shall confer with each other, and the

22

party requesting the rescheduling of the hearing shall identify the upcoming available dates on the

23

Court’s calendar at which all counsel are available for the hearing.

24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 27, 2014
______________________________________
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge