Johnson v. United States of America et al

Filing 299

Order by Hon. James Donato denying 295 Motion to Strike; denying 295 Motion for Summary Judgment. (jdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/27/2016)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

JAMES ELLIS JOHNSON,
Plaintiff,

8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12

Case No. 13-cv-02405-JD
ORDER DENYING UNTIMELY
MISCELLANEOUS MOTION

v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Re: Dkt. No. 295

Defendant.
On April 21, 2016, four days before trial in this matter began, pro se plaintiff James

13

Johnson filed a motion for “summary judgment” and to strike defendant’s “defense for reason of

14

fraud on the court.” Dkt. No. 295. The Court has serious doubts about the merits of either motion

15

but denies them as untimely and effectively mooted by the trial.

16
17

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 27, 2016

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

JAMES DONATO
United States District Judge