Johnson v. United States of America et al
Filing
340
ORDER re Bill of Costs 337 339 . Signed by Judge James Donato on 2/9/2017. (jdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/9/2017)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
JAMES ELLIS JOHNSON,
Plaintiff,
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
Case No.13-cv-02405-JD
ORDER RE BILL OF COSTS
v.
Re: Dkt. Nos. 337, 339
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al,
Defendants.
12
13
Pro se plaintiff James Johnson takes issue with the Clerk’s entry of taxed costs in the
14
amount of $2,753.91 against the United States. Dkt. Nos. 337, 339. The Court treats his filings as
15
a motion for review under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d)(1). The taxed sum of $2,753.91
16
is correct, and several claimed costs were properly denied:
17
18
19
20
(1) The Fees of the Clerk were appropriately reduced from $450 to $400, which is
the filing fee actually paid. Civ. L.R. 54-3(a).
(2) Johnson did not provide documentation for Fees for Service and Summons of
Subpoena. The $250 request for those fees was properly denied. Civ. L.R.
54-1(a).
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
(3) Johnson requested $10,450 for the “cost for typing all court doc’s.” Dkt. No.
331 at 6-7. Those expenses are not allowed under 28 U.S.C. § 1920 or Civil
Local Rule 54-3(d).
(4) Expert witness fees are not allowed under Civil Local Rule 54-3(e). The fees
for witnesses were properly reduced to $950, which represents compensable
transportation and subsistence costs. 28 U.S.C. § 1821; Civ. L.R. 54-3(e).
The $249.94 requested for Johnson’s travel to the deposition of his medical
expert was properly excluded under Civil Local Rule 54-3(c).
(5) Johnson requested $936.19 in postal fees and $951.25 in various office
supplies, among other costs of reproducing and exemplifying documents. The
1
2
3
Clerk properly excluded these costs, leaving $1,403.91 for costs of
reproducing documents as outlined in Civil Local Rule 54-3(d).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 9, 2017
4
5
JAMES DONATO
United States District Judge
6
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?