MacQuarrie et al v. Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha et al

Filing 39

TRANSFER ORDER by The United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation TRANSFERRING CASE to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, MDL No. 2471. (Attachments: #(1) Record Request Letter)(tnS) (Filed on 10/23/2013)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION IN RE: VEHICLE CARRIER SERVICES ANTITRUST LITIGATION MDL No. 2471 TRANSFER ORDER Before the Panel:* Plaintiffs in one Northern District of California action have moved, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings of this litigation in the Northern District of California. All parties agree that centralization is warranted, but disagree as to which is the most appropriate transferee dastrict. Plaintiffs in thirteen actions and potential tag-along actions pending in the Northern District of California, the Middle District of Florida, the District ofNew Jersey, and the Southern District ofNew York support the motion. Plaintiffs in two ofthese actions suggest centralization in the Middle District of Florida, in the alternative. Supporting the District of New Jersey as transferee district are plaintiffs in one District of New Jersey action and one Southern District ofNew York potential tag-along action, as well as defendants. 1 The District o fN ew Jersey plaintiff alternatively supports centralization in theN orthern District of California, and defendants alternatively suggest centralization in the Southern District of New York. Plaintiffs in three Southern District of California actions and potential tag -along actions suggest centralization in that district. This litigation currently consists of six actions listed on Schedule A and pending in four districts, two actions each in the Middle District of Florida and the District ofNew Jersey, and one Judge Sarah S. Vance did not participate in the disposition of this matter. American Auto Logistics, Inc.; American Auto Logistics, LP; American Logistics Network, LLP; American Roll-on Roll-Off Carrier, LLC; American Shipping and Logistics Group, Inc.; Campania Sud An1ericana De Vapores S.A.; CSAV Agency, LLC; EUKOR Vehicle Carriers Inc.; Fujitrans U.s:A., Inc.; Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd.; "K" Line America, Inc.; Mitsui O.S.K. Bulk Shipping (USA), Inc.; Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd.; MOL (America), Inc.; MOL Logistics (U.S.A.), Inc.; Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha; Nissan Motor Car Carrier Co., Ltd.; NYK Line (North America) Inc.; Toyofuji Shipping Co., Ltd.; Wallenius Lines AB; Wallenius Wilhelmsen Logistics Americas LLC; Wallenius Wilhelmsen Logistics AS; Wilh. Wilhelmsen Holding ASA; World Logistics Service (U.S.A.) Inc.; World WWL Vehicle Services Americas Inc. ~ --..'' -2- On the basis of the papers filed and hearing session held, we find that the common questions of fact, and that centralization under Section 1407 in the will serve the convenience of the parties and witnesses and promote the just and ett1¢1¢q.t this litigation. These actions share factual questions relating to allegations that u...,,_...,,~..'fll~'" to fix, raise, maintain, and stabilize the price of vehicle carrier services charged to orijgijl:~l manufacturers in violation ofSection 1ofthe Sherman Antitrust Act, and coJTe!;pona~gl and state consumer protection statutes. Centralization will eliminate duplicative inconsistent pretrial rulings, including with respect to class certification; and of the parties, their counsel, and the judiciary. There is no clear focal point for this litigation, which is hi-coastal in nature, located in Asia and Europe. On balance, we are persuaded that the District of appropriate transferee forum for this litigation. Two actions are pending in this Esther Salas, an experienced transferee judge who presently is not presiding over defendants maintain their United States headquarters in New Jersey. The ease makes the District OfNew Jersey a good choice for transferee district. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, the Schedule A are transferred to the District ofNew Jersey and, with the consent of · to the Honorable Esther Salas for coordinated or consolidated pretrial orc,cei~Ourlgfl PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGA Chairman Kathryn H. Vratil Marjorie 0. Rendell Lewis A. Kaplan 2 The Panel has been notified of nineteen related actions pending in theN California, the Southerrt District of California, the District ofNew Jersey, and the ofNew Y ark. These and any other related actions are potential tag-along actions. 1.1(h), 7.1 and 7.2. IN RE: VEHICLE CARRIER SERVICES No. 2471 ANTITRUST LITIGATION SCHEDULE A Northern District of California li ,: :1 Joan MacQuarrie, et al. v. Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha, et al., C.A. Noll :13-02409 Southern District of California David Schroeder v. Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha, et al., C.A. No. 3:13~0 319 Middle District ofFlorida rf . 3:13-00604 Kenneth A. Nelson, et al. v. Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha, et al., C.A. Esteban Adame v. Nippon Yesen Kabushiki Kaisha, et al., C.A. No. 3:13-0P 51 District ofNew Jersey F. Ruggiero & Sons, Inc., et al. v. NYK Line (North America) Inc., et al., C.A. No. 2:13-03306 Bethanne Knudson v. NYK Line (North America) Inc., et al., C.A. No. 2:13 485 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?