Flores et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 10

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response due by 7/15/2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 7/8/2013. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/8/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

Northern District of California

United States District Court

11
12
13

BERNARD T. FLORES, AND
BENJAMIN T. FLORES,

14
15

Case No.: C-13-2410 JSC
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Plaintiffs,
v.

16
17

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al.,

18

Defendants.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Now pending before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 8) which is
set for hearing on August 1, 2013. Plaintiffs have not filed an opposition or statement of nonopposition as required by Local Rule 7-3. Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS Plaintiffs
to SHOW CAUSE as to why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute.
Plaintiffs should file a response to the ORDER to SHOW CAUSE, along with a response to
the Motion to Dismiss, on or before July 15, 2013. If no response is received, this action may
be dismissed with prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), for failure to
prosecute.

1
2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

3
4

Dated: July 8, 2013
_________________________________
JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

5
6
7
8
9
10

Northern District of California

United States District Court

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2