Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. et al v. IMPAX Laboratories, Inc.

Filing 24

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL 15 (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 7/11/2013)

1
2
3
4
5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICAL CO.,

9

Plaintiff,

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12

No. C 13-02416 SI
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE
UNDER SEAL

v.
IMPAX LABORATORIES INC.,
Defendant.

/

13
14

On July 1, 2013, defendant filed an administrative motion to seal documents in connection with

15

its opposition to an administrative motion to relate. The administrative motion to relate was pending

16

in a separate case in this District before Judge Koh – Par Pharmaceutical, Inc., et al. v. Takeda

17

Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., et al., 13-CV-01927-LHK. Thus, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3-12(e), the

18

administrative motion to seal and the opposition to the motion to relate should have been filed in the

19

case pending before Judge Koh. On July 9, 2013, Judge Koh granted the motion to relate, thereby

20

relating the instant case and others to the case already pending before her. Accordingly, defendant’s

21

administrative motion to seal is now MOOT and therefore the motion is DENIED.

22
23

IT IS SO ORDERED.

24
25
Dated: July 11, 2013
26
27
28

SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge