Freeman v. United States

Filing 18

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AND RESETTING HEARING DATE ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS re 16 Request filed by Welborn Freeman. Mr. Freeman's Response/Opposition is by 9/30/2013. The government's Reply (if any) is due by 10/7/2013. Motion Hearing reset for 10/30/2013 02:00 PM in Courtroom 12, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. William H. Orrick. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 08/13/2013. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/13/2013)

Download PDF
Freeman v. United States Doc. 18 1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 WELBORN FREEMAN, Case No. 13-cv-02421-WHO Plaintiff, 8 v. 9 10 UNITED STATES, Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 5, 16 11 United States District Court Northern District of California ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AND RESETTING HEARING DATE ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS 12 13 On August 6, 2013, defendant United States renoticed its motion to dismiss and set that 14 motion for hearing on September 18, 2013. Docket No. 14. On August 12, 2013, plaintiff 15 Welborn Freeman filed a request, seeking additional time to respond to the Motion to Dismiss. 16 Docket No. 16. Mr. Freeman asks the Court to give him until September 28, 2013, to file his 17 opposition in light of his disability and his efforts to secure an attorney. 18 The Court GRANTS Mr. Freeman’s request for an extension of time. Mr. Freeman’s 19 opposition to the government’s motion to dismiss is due by Monday September 30, 2013. The 20 government’s Reply (if any) is due by October 7, 2013. The hearing on the Motion to Dismiss is 21 reset to Wednesday October 30, 2013 at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, 450 Golden Gate 22 Avenue, San Francisco. 23 24 25 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 13, 2013 ______________________________________ WILLIAM H. ORRICK United States District Judge 27 28 Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?