Gonzales v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO TO FILE SUR-REPLY BY NOON ON MARCH 1, 2017 (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 2/23/2017)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case No. 13-cv-02447-SI
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al.,
ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT
WELLS FARGO TO FILE SUR-REPLY
BY NOON ON MARCH 1, 2017
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Plaintiff’s motion to enforce the settlement agreement is scheduled for a hearing on March
3, 2017. Plaintiff did not provide a copy of the settlement agreement with his motion, nor does the
motion specify how Wells Fargo allegedly breached the settlement agreement. Wells Fargo’s
opposition argues, inter alia, that plaintiff has failed to demonstrate any breach of the contract
because of a failure of proof. In his reply papers, plaintiff states that Wells Fargo breached the
settlement agreement by failing to forgive portions of his loan balance, for a total of $86,953.47.
Plaintiff also filed a declaration in support of the reply brief which includes, inter alia, a copy of
the settlement agreement and bank and loan statements.
The Court directs defendant to file a sur-reply by noon on March 1, 2017, addressing
whether Wells Fargo has breached the settlement agreement by failing to forgive any portion of
plaintiff’s loan balance.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 23, 2017
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?