Tindle et al v. City of Daly City et al

Filing 28

ORDER SCHEDULING TRIAL AND PRETRIAL MATTERS. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 12/9/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/9/2013)

1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2
3

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

4
5

Tindle,

No. CV13-02449 JSW

6
7
8

Plaintiff,
v.
City of Daly City,

9

Defendant.

10

/

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

ORDER SCHEDULING TRIAL AND
PRETRIAL MATTERS

12
Following the Case Management Conference, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Case
13
Management Statement is adopted, except as expressly modified by this Order. It is further
14
ORDERED that:
15
A.

DATES

16
Jury Trial Date: 5/18/2015, at 8:00 a.m.,
17
Pretrial Conference: Monday, 4/27/2015, at 2:00 p.m.
18
Last Day to Hear Dispositive Motions: Friday, 12/19/2014, 9:00 a.m.
19
Last Day for Expert Discovery: 11/21/2014
20
Last Day for Expert Disclosure: 9/26/2014
21
Close of Non-expert Discovery: 8/1/2014
22
B.

DISCOVERY

23
The parties are reminded that a failure voluntarily to disclose information pursuant to
24
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a) or to supplement disclosures or discovery responses
25
pursuant to Rule 26(e) may result in exclusionary sanctions. Thirty days prior to the close of
26
non-expert discovery, lead counsel for each party shall serve and file a certification that all
27
supplementation has been completed.
28

1

C.

ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

2

This matter is referred for assignment to a Magistrate Judge to conduct a settlement

3

conference to be completed within 120 days. Counsel will be contacted by that judge's

4

chambers with a date and time for the conference.

No provision of this order may be changed except by written order of this court upon its

7

own motion or upon motion of one or more parties made pursuant to Civil. L. R. 7-1 or 7-1-(b)

8

without a showing of very good cause. If the modification sought is an extension of a deadline

9

contained herein, the motion must be brought before expiration of that deadline. The parties

10

may not modify the pretrial schedule by stipulation. A conflict with a court date set after the

11
For the Northern District of California

D.

6

United States District Court

5

date of this order does not constitute good cause. The parties are advised that if they stipulate to

12

a change in the discovery schedule, they do so at their own risk. The only discovery schedule

13

that the Court will enforce is the one set in this order. Additionally, briefing schedules that are

14

specifically set by the court may not be altered by stipulation; rather the parties must obtain

15

leave of Court.

16

PROCEDURE FOR AMENDING THIS ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

17
Dated: December 9, 2013
18

JEFFREY S. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2