Allen et al v. OE Services, LLC

Filing 15

ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION. Case Management Conference set for 9/19/2013 10:00 AM; Motion Hearing set for 8/8/2013 01:30 PM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Richard Seeborg. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 7/3/13. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/3/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 10 11 STEPHANIE ALLEN, an Individual, and ROSETTA STONE, LTD., a Virginia 12 Corporation, 13 14 Plaintiffs, Case No. 13-CV-02460-RS [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION Crtrm.: 3, 17th Floor v. The Hon. Richard Seeborg 15 OE SERVICES, LLC d/b/a OPEN ENGLISH LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company, 16 and DOES 1-50, inclusive, 17 Trial Date: None Set Defendants. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 13-CV-02460-RS [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION 1 The Court has read and considered the Joint Stipulation to continue motion hearing dates 2 and case management conference filed by plaintiffs Stephanie Allen and Rosetta Stone Ltd. and 3 defendant OE Services, LLC dba Open English LLC. For good cause shown, the Joint 4 Stipulation is hereby GRANTED. 5 1. The hearing on the motion to dismiss or stay (Docket No. 5) shall be continued 6 from July 18, 2013 to August 8, 2013; 7 2. The case management conference shall be continued mid- to late-September, such 19 8 that it shall be held on September ___, 2013; and 9 3. The deadline for the parties’ F.R.C.P. 26(f) conference shall be continued from July 10 3, 2013 to a date no later than 21 days before the continued case management conference, now set 11 for September ___, 2013. 19 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 14 Dated: 7/3/13 15 Hon. Richard Seeborg U.S. District Court Judge 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION 13-CV-02460-RS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?