Evans et al v. Hewlett Packard Company et al

Filing 58

ORDER DENYING PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY WILLIE GARY by Hon. William Alsup denying 52 Motion for Pro Hac Vice.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/26/2013)

1
2
3
4
5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9

ERNEST EVANS,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12

No. C 13-2477 WHA

Plaintiff,
v.

13

HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, et
al.,

14

ORDER DENYING PRO HAC
VICE APPLICATION OF
ATTORNEY WILLIE GARY

Defendants.
/

15
16

The pro hac vice application of Attorney Willie Gary (Dkt. No. 52) is DENIED for failing

17

to comply with Local Rule 11-3. The local rule requires that an applicant certify that “he or she

18

is an active member in good standing of the bar of a United States Court or of the highest court

19

of another State or the District of Columbia, specifying such bar” (emphasis added). Filling out

20

the pro hac vice form from the district court website such that it only identifies the state of bar

21

membership is inadequate under the local rule because it fails to identify a specific court. While

22

the application fee does not need to be paid again, the application cannot be processed until a

23

corrected form is submitted.

24
25

IT IS SO ORDERED.

26
27
28

Dated: July 25, 2013.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE