Evans et al v. Hewlett Packard Company et al

Filing 78

ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE by Hon. William Alsup denying 76 Stipulation.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/24/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
ERNEST EVANS, et al.,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

Plaintiffs,

12
13

No. C 13-02477 WHA

v.

ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO
MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE

14

HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, et
al.,

15

Defendants.
/

16
17

The parties request an extension of time for plaintiffs to file their reply brief in support of

18

the pending motion for leave to amend (Dkt. No. 76). The request vaguely states that the

19

extension is needed to “accommodate the case load and schedules of the Plaintiffs” but does not

20

justify increasing plaintiffs’ time to file at the expense of the Court’s time to review the motion.

21

Good cause not found, the request is DENIED.

22
23

IT IS SO ORDERED.

24
25
26
27
28

Dated: September 24, 2013.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE