Touchscreen Gestures LLC v. Google Inc.

Filing 65

ORDER RE PARTIAL DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS AND THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT by Judge Alsup terminating 59 Ex Parte Application ; granting in part and denying in part 62 Motion for Leave to File (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/17/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 TOUCHSCREEN GESTURES LLC, 6 Plaintiff, 7 v. 8 CASE NO. 3:13-cv-02478-WHA GOOGLE INC., 9 [PROPOSED] ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS Defendant. 10 11 WHEREAS, on July 19, 2013, plaintiff Touchscreen Gestures LLC (“Touchscreen”) 12 filed an amended complaint (“Amended Complaint,” Doc. #41) alleging, among other things, 13 that Google Inc. infringed, and was infringing, U.S. Patent No. 7,180,506 (“the ’506 patent”), 14 U.S. Patent No. 7,184,031 (“the ’031 patent”), U.S. Patent No. 7,190,356 (“the ’356 patent”), 15 U.S. Patent No. 8,164,575 (“the ’575 patent”), and U.S. Patent No. 7,274,357 (“the ’357 16 patent”) (collectively, the “Asserted Patents”); and 17 WHEREAS, Touchscreen in its Amended Complaint further identified “examples of 18 Google products that infringe” each of the aforementioned patents, including the “Motorola 19 Atrix and Droid 3 smartphones as well as the Google Nexus 7 tablet”; and 20 WHEREAS, on July 25, 2013, Touchscreen served its Disclosure of Asserted Claims 21 and Infringement Contentions for Defendant Google Inc. and asserted, among other things, that 22 “the Google Chromebook, which allow the identification of a movement of a single tap . . . 23 infringe[s] claims of the ’506 patent;” and 24 WHEREAS, in its infringement contentions, Touchscreen further contended that 25 Google infringes the asserted claims “contributorily, and or by inducement” and “that it is 26 nonetheless a direct infringer under the theory of joint infringement in that it instructs, directs 27 and requires its customers to perform any steps it does not itself perform, or because any 28 ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS -1- Case No. 3:13-cv-02478-WHA 1 component alleged missing from any apparatus claim is supplied by its customers at Google’s 2 instruction and control;” and 3 4 5 6 WHEREAS, Defendants Google Inc. (“Google”) denied those allegations in its answer and asserted related affirmative defenses and counterclaims; and WHEREAS, Google has raised objections with Touchscreen regarding the sufficiency of its infringement contentions and other disclosures; and 7 WHEREAS, the parties wish to resolve those disputes concerning Touchscreen’s claims 8 related to the ’031, ’575, and ’357, ’506 patents and the Motorola Atrix smartphone, Droid 3 9 smartphone, and Google Chromebook; 10 11 12 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED THAT: (1) Touchscreen’s claims that Google has infringed, and is infringing, the ’031, ’575, 13 ’357 and ’506 patents by Google products that were accused or could have been 14 accused by Plaintiff as of the date of Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (Doc. #41) 15 are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and Google’s counterclaims seeking 16 declaratory judgment of non-infringement and invalidity of the ’031, ’575, ’357 17 and ’506 patents are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as moot; 18 (2) Touchscreen’s claims against Google that the making, use, sale, offering for sale, 19 or importation of Motorola Atrix smartphones, Motorola Droid 3 smartphones, 20 and Google Chromebooks infringe, and have infringed, any of the Asserted 21 Patents are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; 22 (3) Touchscreen’s remaining claim that Google has infringed, and is infringing the 23 ’356 patent is limited to allegations of direct infringement by Google’s making, 24 use, sale, offering for sale or importation of the Google Nexus 7 tablet; 25 26 27 28 (4) Touchscreen’s Third Amended Complaint shall be revised to: (a) delete paragraphs 6-10 relating to Touchscreen’s allegations of infringement of the ’506 patent; (b) remove the reference to the ’506 patent in the Prayer for Relief; ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS -2- Case No. 3:13-cv-02478-WHA 1 (c) remove the reference to the “Google Chromebook” as an accused product in 2 paragraph 18 in Touchscreen’s claim of infringement of the ’356 patent; and 3 (d) replace all general references to “infringement” with more specific references 4 to “direct infringement” in paragraphs 13 and 14 and in the Prayer for Relief. 5 DATED: 11 12 ________________________________ William Alsup RED RD Judge United States District E S SO O IT I IFIED S MOD A NO 13 RT 14 illi Judge W ER 16 p am Alsu A H 15 RT U O 10 Date: October 16, 2013. ICT C ES AT T R NIA 9 HON. WILLIAM H. ALSUP,DISTR U.S.D.J. FO IT IS SO ORDERED. LI 8 S 7 Touchscreen shall file its third amended complaint revised as stated above by October 21 at Noon. To this extent, the motion forIT IS HEREBYis Granted. Defendant Google shall file leave to amend SO ORDERED: its answer to the third amended complaint within seven days of the date it is filed. UNIT ED 6 N F D IS T IC T O R C 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS -3- Case No. 3:13-cv-02478-WHA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?