TVBI Company Limited v. Pham

Filing 51

ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO EXECUTE SETTLEMENT DOCUMENTATION re 50 and 49 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 7/30/14. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/30/2014)

Download PDF
1 LAWRENCEJ. HILTON (State BarNo. 156524) lhilton@oneil-llp.com 2 KATHLEEN A.. DONAHUE (State Bar No. 294226) O'NEILLLP 3 19900 MacArthur Boulevard, Suite 1050 Irvine California 92612 4 Telephone: (949) 798-0500 Facsimile: (949) 798-0511 5 6 Attorn~ys for Plaintiff TVBI COMPANY LIMITED 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 TVBI COMPANY LIMITED, a Hong 12 Kong corporation, Case No. CV 13 2492 13 EXECUTE SETTLEMENT 14 Plaintiff, rPROPOSEDl ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO DOCUMENTATION 49] v. 15 HONG THOA THI PRAM, an 16 individual; and DOES 1 through 10, 17 inclusive, 18 Defendants. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER #142610 vl l3042.9 7/30/2014 [DOCKET NO. 1 The parties have filed a request for an additional extension of time to execute 2 their settlement documentation. [Docket No. 49.] The request is hereby granted. 3 The parties shall execute all settlement-related documents by no later than August 1, 4 2014. The parties shall certify completion by filing a joint letter addressed to Judge yu na M. R RT 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 [PROPOSED] #142610 vl 13042.9 7/30/2014 ORDER DONNAM.RYU C United States Magistrate Judge N F ER H 10 on Judge D LI NO 9 Dated: 7/30/2014 A 8 D TE GRAN R NIA S UNIT ED IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 RT U O 6 S DISTRICT TE C TA FO 5 Ryu. D IS T IC T O R PROOF OF SERVICE 1 2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE 3 At the time of service, I was over 18 years of age and not a party to this action. I am employed in the County of Orange, State of California. My business address is 19900 4 MacArthur Boulevard, Suite 1050, Irvine, California 92612. 5 On July 30, 2014, I served true copies of the following document(s) described as [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO EXECUTE 6 SETTLEMENT DOCUMENTATION on the interested parties in this action as follows: 7 8 9 10 11 12 • James Lloyd Dawson jld@gedlaw.com,sharlene@gedlaw.com • Marc Alan Eisenhart mae@gedlaw.com,sharlene@gedlaw.com • Nicholas Garrett Emanuel nge@gedlaw.com,sharlene@gedlaw.com • Shawn Robert Parr shawn@parrlawgroup.com,donna@parrlawgroup.com • Walter J Robinson walter.robinsoneanillsburv.com 13 D BY MAIL: I enclosed the document(s) in a sealed envelope or package addressed to the persons at the addresses listed in the Service List and placed the envelope for 14 collection and mailing, following our ordinary business practices. I am readily familiar with O'Neil LLP's practice for collecting and processing correspondence for mailing. On 15 the same day that the correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited in 16 the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service, in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid. 17 D BY E-MAIL OR ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION: I caused a copy of the 18 document(s) to be sent from e-mail address to the persons at the e-mail addresses listed in the Service List. I did not receive, within a reasonable time after the transmission, any 19 electronic message or other indication that the transmission was unsuccessful. ~ BY CM/ECF NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING: I caused said document(s) 20 to be served by means of this Court's electronic transmission of the Notice of Electronic 21 Filing through the Court's transmission facilities, to the parties andlor counsel who are registered CMlECF Users set forth in the service list obtained from this Court. 22 Executed on July 30, 2014, at Irvine, California. 23 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America 24 that the foregoing is true and correct and that I am employed in the 0 fice of a member of the bar of this Court at whose direction the service was made. 25 26 Shaun Simmons (NAME OF DECLARANT) 27 28 #134464 vI

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?