Fortinet Inc. v. FireEye Inc.
Filing
152
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 151 Motion for Pro Hac Vice. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/13/2015)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
Fortinet Inc.
Plaintiff(s),
4
v.
5
FireEye Inc.
6
Defendant(s).
7
8
9
10
11
12
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No: 3:13-cv-02496-HSG
APPLICATION FOR
ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY
PRO HAC VICE
(CIVIL LOCAL RULE 11-3)
I, Phong T. Dinh
, an active member in good standing of the bar of
District of Columbia Court
of Appeals
, hereby respectfully apply for admission to practice pro hac vice in the
Northern District of California
FireEye Inc.
representing:
in the
, an
above-entitled action. My local co-counsel in this case is Rachel M. Walsh
attorney who is a member of the bar of this Court in good standing and who maintains an office
within the State of California.
13
MY ADDRESS OF RECORD:
LOCAL CO-COUNSEL'S ADDRESS OF RECORD:
14
Goodwin Procter LLP
901 New York Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20001-4432
Goodwin Procter LLP
Three Embarcadero Center, 24th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-4003
15
MY TELEPHONE # OF RECORD:
LOCAL CO-COUNSEL'S TELEPHONE # OF RECORD:
(202) 346-4000
(415) 733-6000
MY EMAIL ADDRESS OF RECORD:
LOCAL CO-COUNSEL'S EMAIL ADDRESS OF RECORD:
PDinh@goodwinprocter.com
RWalsh@goodwinprocter.com
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
I am an active member in good standing of a United States Court or of the highest court of
another State or the District of Columbia, as indicated above; my bar number is: 1004477.
A true and correct copy of a certificate of good standing or equivalent official document from
said bar is attached to this application.
I agree to familiarize myself with, and abide by, the Local Rules of this Court, especially the
Standards of Professional Conduct for attorneys and the Alternative Dispute Resolution Local
Rules.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
/s/ Phong T. Dinh
Dated: 08/12/2015
APPLICANT
Phong T. Dinh
ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION
FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the application of Phong T. Dinh
is granted,
subject to the terms and conditions of Civil L.R. 11-3. All papers filed by the attorney must
indicate appearance pro hac vice. Service of papers upon, and communication with, local cocounsel designated in the application will constitute notice to the party.
Dated: 8/13/2015
28
UNITED STATES DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE
American LegalNet, Inc.
PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION & ORDER
October 2012
~istrid
of a.lnlumhia a.lourtnf J\ppenls
dlommifue on J\bmissimts
430 If ~irtei, ~t;II ~
-
~om 123
~aslpngton, ~EL dl~ znnn1
202 I 879-2710
I, JULIO 5'\.. C.JlSTILLO, C(erli of tlie 1Jistrict of Co(umbia Court
of .:Ayyeafs, do liereby certify tliat
PHONG TRUONG DINH
-was on NOVEMBER 4, 2011 du(y qua(ijied and admitted as an
attorney and counse(or entit(ed to yractice before tliis Court and is,
on tlie date indicated be(ow, an active member in good standing of
tliis
~ar.
In Testimony Wliereofi I liave
fiereunto su13scribed my name
andaffixed tlie seafof tfiis Court
at tlie City of Wasliingtcm 'D.C.,
on August 12, 2015 .
jULIO A. CASTILLO
C(erli of tlie Court
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
1
2
The undersigned hereby certified that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing
3
document has been served on August 12, 2015, to all counsel of record who are deemed to have
4
consented to electronic service via the Court’s CM/ECF system per Civil Local Rule 5-5. Any
5
counsel of record who have not consented to electronic service through the Court’s CM/ECF system
6
will be served by electronic mail, first class mail, facsimile and/or overnight delivery.
7
Dated: August 12, 2015
Respectfully Submitted,
By: /s/ Phong T. Dinh
Phong T. Dinh
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Application for Admission of Pro Hac Vice
Case No. 3:13-CV-02496-HSG
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?