Fortinet Inc. v. FireEye Inc.

Filing 222

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 221 Stipulation for Dismissal of State Law Claims with Prejudice and of Patent Claims without Prejudice. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/22/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

SHANE BRUN (SBN 179079)
[e-mail]
RACHEL M. WALSH (SBN 250568)
[e-mail]
GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
Three Embarcadero Center, 24th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415.677.9041
CHARLES H. SANDERS (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
LANA SHIFERMAN (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
53 State Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02109
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 617.523.1231
Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaim
Plaintiff FIREEYE, INC.

12
13

[SEE SIGNATURE PAGE FOR COMPLETE
LIST OF COUNSEL]

14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

17
18

FORTINET, INC.,
Plaintiff,

19
20

v.

21

FIREEYE, INC.,
Defendant.

22
23

Case No. 3:13-cv-02496-HSG
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF STATE
LAW CLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE AND
OF PATENT CLAIMS WITHOUT
PREJUDICE
Judge:
Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
Courtroom: 15, 18th Floor
Action Filed: June 5, 2013

FIREEYE, INC.,
24
Counterclaim Plaintiff,
25
v.
26
FORTINET, INC.,
27
Counterclaim Defendant.
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF STATE LAW CLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE
AND OF PATENT CLAIMS WITHOUT PREJUDICE
CASE NO. 3:13-CV-02496-HSG

1

WHEREAS, on September 21, 2015, Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant Fortinet, Inc.

2

(“Fortinet”), and Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff FireEye, Inc. (“FireEye”) entered into a

3

settlement agreement (“Settlement Agreement”) addressing all issues and controversies in the

4

above-entitled action, pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a);

5
6
7
8
9

THEREFORE, IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED between the parties, through their
respective counsel of record herein, that:
1) Fortinet’s state law claims (Counts VII-VIII of Fortinet’s Second Amended Complaint,
D.I. 71) shall be dismissed with prejudice;
2) Fortinet’s patent infringement claims (Counts I-VI of Fortinet’s Second Amended

10

Complaint, D.I. 71), and FireEye’s corresponding counterclaims for declaratory relief

11

of non-infringement, invalidity and unenforceability (Counts IV-V of D.I. 85) shall be

12

dismissed without prejudice;

13

3) FireEye’s patent infringement counterclaims (Counts I-III of D.I. 85), and Fortinet’s

14

corresponding counterclaims for declaratory judgment of non-infringement and

15

invalidity (First through Sixth Counterclaims of D.I. 88) shall be dismissed without

16

prejudice;

17

4) The parties shall each bear their own costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees;

18

5) All signatories listed, and on whose behalf the filing is submitted, concur in the filing’s

19
20

content and have authorized the filing.
IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF STATE LAW CLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE
AND OF PATENT CLAIMS WITHOUT PREJUDICE
CASE NO. 3:13-CV-02496-HSG

1

1

Dated: September 21, 2015

Respectfully submitted,

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

By: /s/ Shane Brun
SHANE BRUN (SBN 179079)
[e-mail]
RACHEL M. WALSH (SBN 250568)
[e-mail]
LAUREL KILGOUR (SBN 269307)
[e-mail]
DAVID SIMSON (SBN 287900)
[e-mail]
GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
Three Embarcadero Center, 24th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111-4071
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415.677.9041
CHARLES H. SANDERS (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
LANA SHIFERMAN (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
J. ANTHONY DOWNS (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
DANIEL M. FORMAN (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
53 State Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02109
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 617.523.1231
PHONG T. DINH (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
901 New York Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20001
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 202.346.4444
Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaim
Plaintiff FIREEYE, INC.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF STATE LAW CLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE
AND OF PATENT CLAIMS WITHOUT PREJUDICE
CASE NO. 3:13-CV-02496-HSG

2

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Dated: September 21, 2015

By: /s/ John M. Neukom
JOHN M. NEUKOM (SBN 275887)
[e-mail]
JORDAN R. JAFFE (SBN 254886)
[e-mail]
MATTHEW D. CANNON (SBN 252666)
[e-mail]
ANDREW M. HOLMES (SBN 260475)
[e-mail]
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, California 94111-4788
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415.875.6700
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim
Defendant FORTINET, INC.

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF STATE LAW CLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE
AND OF PATENT CLAIMS WITHOUT PREJUDICE
CASE NO. 3:13-CV-02496-HSG

3

1

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff Fortinet, Inc.’s state law

2

claims are dismissed with prejudice, and that the parties’ respective patent infringement claims

3

and corresponding counterclaims for invalidity, unenforceability and non-infringement are

4

dismissed without prejudice.

5
6
7

Dated: _______________, 2015
September 22
The Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
United States District Court Judge

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF STATE LAW CLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE
AND OF PATENT CLAIMS WITHOUT PREJUDICE
CASE NO. 3:13-CV-02496-HSG

1

LOCAL RULE 5-1(i)(3) ATTESTATION

1
2

I, Shane Brun, am the ECF user whose ID and Password are being used to file this

3

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF STATE LAW

4

CLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE AND OF PATENT CLAIMS WITHOUT PREJUDICE . In

5

compliance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that John M. Neukom counsel for

6

Plaintiff, Fortinet, Inc., has concurred in its filing.

7
8
9

Dated: September 21, 2015

/s/ Shane Brun
Shane Brun

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF STATE LAW CLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE AND OF
PATENT CLAIMS WITHOUT PREJUDICE
CASE NO. 3:13-CV-02496-HSG

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

1
2

The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing

3

document has been served on September 21, 2015, to all counsel of record who are deemed to

4

have consented to electronic service via the Court’s CM/ECF system. Any counsel of record who

5

have not consented to electronic service through the Court’s CM/ECF system will be served by

6

electronic mail, first class mail, facsimile and/or overnight delivery.

7
/s/ Shane Brun
Shane Brun

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
CASE NO. 3:13-CV-02496-HSG