Sterling Savings Bank v. Vessel Imagine et al
Filing
15
ORDER SETTING TIME. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 8/28/13. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/28/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
No. C 13-2499 RS
STERLING SAVINGS BANK,
ORDER SETTING TIME
Plaintiff,
v.
THE VESSEL IMAGINE, et al.,
Defendants.
____________________________________/
16
17
The report and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge to whom this action
18
was initially assigned that a warrant for the arrest of the vessel Imagine should issue and a substitute
19
custodian should be appointed was adopted and incorporated in full. See Dkt. 10. The vessel
20
Imagine has since been arrested and is in the custody of Plaintiff’s substitute custodian. To comply
21
with Admiralty Local Rule 4-2(a)(7), plaintiff intends to publish a notice of the arrest of the vehicle,
22
containing a statement that any persons claiming an interest in the Imagine must file their
23
applications for intervention “within the time fixed by the Court.” The federal rules require that
24
such notice must be published “promptly—or within the time that the court allows.” Fed. R. Civ. P.
25
Supp. C(4).
26
27
Plaintiff shall publish the notice required by Admiralty Local Rule 4-2 within 14 days of the
date of this order. “[A]pplications for intervention under Fed. R. Civ. P. 24 by persons claiming
28
1
No. 13-2499 RS
ORDER
1
maritime liens or other interests against the property shall be filed” within 60 days from the date of
2
plaintiff’s publication order. Admiralty L. R. 4-2(a)(7).
3
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 8/28/13
RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
6
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
No. 13-2499 RS
ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?