Sterling Savings Bank v. Vessel Imagine et al

Filing 15

ORDER SETTING TIME. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 8/28/13. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/28/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 No. C 13-2499 RS STERLING SAVINGS BANK, ORDER SETTING TIME Plaintiff, v. THE VESSEL IMAGINE, et al., Defendants. ____________________________________/ 16 17 The report and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge to whom this action 18 was initially assigned that a warrant for the arrest of the vessel Imagine should issue and a substitute 19 custodian should be appointed was adopted and incorporated in full. See Dkt. 10. The vessel 20 Imagine has since been arrested and is in the custody of Plaintiff’s substitute custodian. To comply 21 with Admiralty Local Rule 4-2(a)(7), plaintiff intends to publish a notice of the arrest of the vehicle, 22 containing a statement that any persons claiming an interest in the Imagine must file their 23 applications for intervention “within the time fixed by the Court.” The federal rules require that 24 such notice must be published “promptly—or within the time that the court allows.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 25 Supp. C(4). 26 27 Plaintiff shall publish the notice required by Admiralty Local Rule 4-2 within 14 days of the date of this order. “[A]pplications for intervention under Fed. R. Civ. P. 24 by persons claiming 28 1 No. 13-2499 RS ORDER 1 maritime liens or other interests against the property shall be filed” within 60 days from the date of 2 plaintiff’s publication order. Admiralty L. R. 4-2(a)(7). 3 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 8/28/13 RICHARD SEEBORG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 6 7 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 No. 13-2499 RS ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?