Gametek LLC v. Zynga Inc.

Filing 103

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING THE DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE (AND DEFENDANT'S REPLY) REGARDING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 7/11/14. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/11/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 John J. Edmonds (State Bar No. 274200) jedmonds@cepiplaw.com Stephen F. Schlather (admitted pro hac vice) sschlather@cepiplaw.com Shea Palavan (admitted pro hac vice) spalavan@cepiplaw.com COLLINS EDMONDS POGORZELSKI SCHLATHER & TOWER, PLLC 1851 East First Street, Suite 900 Santa Ana, California 92705 Telephone: (951) 708-1237 Facsimile: (951) 824-7901 8 9 Attorneys for Plaintiff, GAMETEK LLC 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 12 13 GAMETEK LLC, 14 Case No.: 3:13-cv-02546-RS Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE (AND DEFENDANT’S REPLY) REGARDING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES 15 v. 16 17 18 ZYNGA, INC., Defendant. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 –1– Case No.: 3:13-cv-02546-RS 1 Before the Court is the stipulated request of Plaintiff, GT Gaming LLC (f/k/a Gametek 2 LLC), and Defendant, Zynga, Inc. (“Zynga”), to extend the deadline for Plaintiff’s response to 3 Defendant’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees, the Honorable Richard Seeborg presiding. 4 Having considered the request, accompanying declaration, and for good cause shown, 5 THE COURT ORDERS AS FOLLOWS: 6 7 The parties’ stipulated request is hereby GRANTED. The deadline for Plaintiff’s Response 8 to Zynga’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees is hereby extended from July 14, 2014 to July 21, 2014, the 9 deadline for Defendant’s Reply is hereby extended from July 21, 2014 to August 4, 2014. 10 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED 11 12 13 DATED: 7/11/14 The Honorable Richard Seeborg United States District Judge Northern District of California 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 –2– Case No.: 3:13-cv-02546-RS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?