Gametek LLC v. Zynga Inc.
Filing
103
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING THE DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE (AND DEFENDANT'S REPLY) REGARDING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 7/11/14. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/11/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
John J. Edmonds (State Bar No. 274200)
jedmonds@cepiplaw.com
Stephen F. Schlather (admitted pro hac vice)
sschlather@cepiplaw.com
Shea Palavan (admitted pro hac vice)
spalavan@cepiplaw.com
COLLINS EDMONDS POGORZELSKI
SCHLATHER & TOWER, PLLC
1851 East First Street, Suite 900
Santa Ana, California 92705
Telephone: (951) 708-1237
Facsimile: (951) 824-7901
8
9
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
GAMETEK LLC
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
12
13
GAMETEK LLC,
14
Case No.: 3:13-cv-02546-RS
Plaintiff,
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE
DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE
(AND DEFENDANT’S REPLY)
REGARDING DEFENDANT’S MOTION
FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES
15
v.
16
17
18
ZYNGA, INC.,
Defendant.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
–1–
Case No.: 3:13-cv-02546-RS
1
Before the Court is the stipulated request of Plaintiff, GT Gaming LLC (f/k/a Gametek
2
LLC), and Defendant, Zynga, Inc. (“Zynga”), to extend the deadline for Plaintiff’s response to
3
Defendant’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees, the Honorable Richard Seeborg presiding.
4
Having considered the request, accompanying declaration, and for good cause shown,
5
THE COURT ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:
6
7
The parties’ stipulated request is hereby GRANTED. The deadline for Plaintiff’s Response
8
to Zynga’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees is hereby extended from July 14, 2014 to July 21, 2014, the
9
deadline for Defendant’s Reply is hereby extended from July 21, 2014 to August 4, 2014.
10
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED
11
12
13
DATED: 7/11/14
The Honorable Richard Seeborg
United States District Judge
Northern District of California
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
–2–
Case No.: 3:13-cv-02546-RS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?