Gametek LLC v. Zynga Inc.

Filing 71

ORDER GRANTING GAMETEK LLC'S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO CHANGE THE TIME OF HEARING ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT. Motion Hearing set for 4/24/2014 01:30 PM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Richard Seeborg. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 3/12/14. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/12/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 John J. Edmonds (State Bar No. 274200) jedmonds@cepiplaw.com Stephen F. Schlather (admitted pro hac vice) sschlather@cepiplaw.com Shea Palavan (admitted pro hac vice) spalavan@cepiplaw.com COLLINS EDMONDS POGORZELSKI SCHLATHER & TOWER, PLLC 1851 East First Street, Suite 900 Santa Ana, California 92705 Telephone: (951) 708-1237 Facsimile: (951) 824-7901 Attorneys for Plaintiff, GAMETEK LLC 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 12 13 GAMETEK LLC, 14 Case No.: 3:13-cv-02546-RS Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING GAMETEK LLC’S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO CHANGE THE TIME OF HEARING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS 15 v. 16 17 18 ZYNGA, INC., Defendant. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 –1– Case No.: 3:13-cv-02546-RS 1 Plaintiff GT Gaming LLC’s (formerly known as “Gametek LLC”) Unopposed Motion to 2 Change the Time of Hearing on Defendant’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings came before this 3 Court, the Honorable Richard Seeborg presiding. 4 Having considered the motion and for good cause shown, 5 THE COURT ORDERS AS FOLLOWS: 6 7 Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion to Change the Time of Hearing on Defendant’s Motion for 8 Judgment on the Pleadings is GRANTED. The hearing on Defendant, Zynga, Inc.’s, Motion for 9 Judgment on the Pleadings is hereby continued one week from April 17, 2014 to April 24, 2014. 10 IT IS SO ORDERED 11 12 13 DATED: 3/12/14 The Honorable Richard Seeborg United States District Judge Northern District of California 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 –2– Case No.: 3:13-cv-02546-RS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?