Gametek LLC v. Zynga Inc.
Filing
97
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF GAMETEK LLC'S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO CHANGE THE TIME OF HEARING ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES. Motion Hearing set for 8/28/2014 01:30 PM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Richard Seeborg. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 7/1/14. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/1/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
John J. Edmonds (State Bar No. 274200)
jedmonds@cepiplaw.com
Stephen F. Schlather (admitted pro hac vice)
sschlather@cepiplaw.com
Shea Palavan (admitted pro hac vice)
spalavan@cepiplaw.com
COLLINS EDMONDS POGORZELSKI
SCHLATHER & TOWER, PLLC
1851 East First Street, Suite 900
Santa Ana, California 92705
Telephone: (951) 708-1237
Facsimile: (951) 824-7901
8
9
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
GAMETEK LLC
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
12
13
GAMETEK LLC,
Case No.: 3:13-cv-02546-RS
14
Plaintiff,
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
PLAINTIFF GAMETEK LLC’S
UNOPPOSED MOTION TO CHANGE THE
TIME OF HEARING ON DEFENDANT’S
MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES
15
v.
16
17
18
ZYNGA, INC.,
Defendant.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
–1–
Case No.: 3:13-cv-02546-RS
1
Plaintiff GT Gaming LLC’s (formerly known as “Gametek LLC”) Unopposed Motion to
2
Change the Time of Hearing on Defendant’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees came before this Court, the
3
Honorable Richard Seeborg presiding.
4
Having considered the motion and for good cause shown,
5
THE COURT ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:
6
7
Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion to Change the Time of Hearing on Defendant’s Motion for
8
Attorney’s Fees is GRANTED. The hearing on Defendant, Zynga, Inc.’s, Motion for Judgment on
9
the Attorney’s Fees is hereby continued from August 7, 2014 to August 28, 2014 at 1:30 p.m.
10
IT IS SO ORDERED
11
12
13
DATED: 7/1/14
The Honorable Richard Seeborg
United States District Judge
Northern District of California
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
–2–
Case No.: 3:13-cv-02546-RS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?