Re/Max LLC. v. Le et al
Filing
55
ORDER VACATING AUGUST 8, 2014 HEARING AND DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AND DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS 40 41 (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 8/7/2014)
1
2
3
4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
No. C 13-02625 SI
REMAX, LLC,
ORDER VACATING AUGUST 8, 2014
HEARING AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AND
DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO
DISMISS
Plaintiff,
v.
MIN LE, et al.,
Defendants.
12
/
13
The Court has reviewed the August 7, 2014 declaration of plaintiff’s counsel Ben Davidson. Mr.
14
Davidson states that he has been in communication with defendant Le since the July 25, 2014 hearing,
15
and that plaintiff “is now satisfied that defendant appears to have made sufficient efforts to comply with
16
the Court’s Order at this time,” and that there is no need to proceed with the August 8, 2014 hearing.
17
Davidson Decl. ¶ 4.
18
Accordingly, the Court VACATES the August 8, 2014 hearing. In light of the current status of
19
defendant’s efforts to comply with the Court’s orders and judgment, the Court DENIES plaintiff’s
20
motion for sanctions. However, if there are further issues regarding defendant’s noncompliance with
21
the Court’s orders and judgment, plaintiff may seek further relief from this Court, including attorney’s
22
fees if appropriate. Defendant’s motion to dismiss this lawsuit is DENIED.
23
This order resolves Docket Nos. 40 and 41.
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
26
27
28
Dated: August 7, 2014
SUSAN ILLSTON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?