Cheng v. Schlumberger
Filing
78
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME TO HEAR MOTION TO DISMISS. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 9/23/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/23/2013)
1
2
3
4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
8
v.
SCHLUMBERGER,
11
Defendant.
/
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
SHORTEN TIME TO HEAR
MOTION TO DISMISS
Plaintiff,
9
10
No. C 13-02641 JSW
TONY CHENG,
12
13
On September 5, 2013, Plaintiff filed an Amendment to his Opposition to Defendant’s
14
Motion to Dismiss and a Motion to Shorten Time. Plaintiff asks that the Court advance the
15
hearing date on the motion to dismiss from November 1, 2013 to October 4, 2013. The Court’s
16
law and motion calendar on October 4, 2013 is closed. The also Court does not find good cause
17
to advance the hearing date to give this motion to dismiss priority over other pending motions.
18
Accordingly, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s request to shorten time.
19
However, as the Court advised the parties at the status conference held on August 26,
20
2013, if the Court determines that it can resolve the motion without a hearing, it will notify the
21
parties in advance of the hearing date.
22
In his reply brief, Plaintiff raises a continued objection to “Defendant’s redundant use of
23
the phrase ‘erroneously identified as Schlumberger Oilfield Services,” and its position that they
24
only represent Schlumberger Limited or Schlumberger N.V. Plaintiff requests that the Court
25
“clarify and eliminate this confusion.” As this Court has previously advised Plaintiff, it cannot
26
provide him with legal advice.
27
//
28
//
1
Accordingly, the Court also DENIES Plaintiff’s request to clarify Defendant’s position.
2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
Dated: September 23, 2013
JEFFREY S. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
4
5
6
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?