Armstrong v. Bauer's Intelligent Transportation, Inc.

Filing 23

STIPULATION REGARDING SCHEDULE AND DEADLINES AND ORDER. The parties' stipulation is approved, with the exception that the Further Case Management Conference and deadline for filing the parties' Joint Statementin connection therewith are hereby CONTINUED to May 16, 2013 and May 9, 2013, respectively. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on December 20, 2013. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/20/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 THE TIDRICK LAW FIRM STEVEN G. TIDRICK, SBN 224760 JOEL B. YOUNG, SBN 236662 2039 Shattuck Avenue, Suite 308 Berkeley, California 94704 Telephone: (510) 788-5100 Facsimile: (510) 291-3226 E-mail: sgt@tidricklaw.com E-mail: jby@tidricklaw.com Attorneys for Individual and Representative Plaintiff RORY ARMSTRONG UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 RORY ARMSTRONG, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, 11 12 13 14 Civil Case No.: 3:13-cv-02691-MMC Removed from Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Francisco Civil Case No.: CGC-13-530147 Plaintiff, v. CLASS ACTION BAUER’S INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION, INC.; and DOES 1-50, STIPULATION REGARDING SCHEDULE AND DEADLINES AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Defendants. 15 16 Complaint Filed: March 29, 2013 17 First Amended Complaint Filed: May 13, 2013 18 (N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 6-1(b) 19 20 21 Pursuant to Northern District of California Civil Local Rule 6-1(b), Plaintiff Rory 22 Armstrong and Defendant Bauer’s Intelligent Transportation, Inc. through their respective 23 counsel of record hereby stipulate as follows: 24 WHEREAS, the ADR session in this matter, consisting of Early Neutral Evaluation 25 and Mediation with the Court-appointed neutral Richard S. Whitmore, is currently scheduled 26 for January 8, 2014; 27 28 WHEREAS, the Court-appointed neutral Richard S. Whitmore supports the extension requested herein; 1 STIPULATION REGARDING SCHEDULE AND DEADLINES AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 WHEREAS, the necessary discovery for the ADR session will not be completed by January 8, 2014, but it will be by February 6, 2014; WHEREAS, the Evaluator/Mediator, and counsel for both sides have communicated and determined that the February 6, 2014 would work for all of them for the ADR session; WHEREAS, a Court order is required to reschedule the ADR session because at the 6 initial case management conference, the Court ordered that ADR “commence no later than 7 120 days from 9/13/2013,” i.e., by January 13, 2014 (per Docket No. 16); 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 WHEREAS, at the initial case management conference, the Court also ordered that Defendant’s dispositive motion on the issue of jurisdiction be filed by February 7, 2014 (per Docket No. 16); THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate as follows and request that the Court enter the Proposed Order below: 1. The deadline for completion of ADR be extended from January 13, 2014 to February 6, 2014. 2. The deadline for Defendant to file its dispositive motion on the issue of jurisdiction is continued from February 7, 2014 to March 7, 2014. 3. The remainder of the schedule remains unchanged, including the Case 18 Management Statement due by April 11, 2014, and the Further Case Management 19 Conference set for April 18, 2014 10:30 AM (per Docket No. 16). 20 Dated: December 20, 2013 /s/ Steven G. Tidrick __________________________ STEVEN G. TIDRICK, SBN 224760 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 THE TIDRICK LAW FIRM Dated: December 20, 2013 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. /s/ Aurelio J. Perez __________________________ ROBERT G. HULTENG, SBN 071293 AURELIO J. PEREZ, SBN 282135 Attorneys for Defendant 2 STIPULATION REGARDING SCHEDULE AND DEADLINES AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 2 3 4 [PROPOSED] ORDER The Parties having stipulated to the foregoing, IT IS SO ORDERED. , with the exception that the Further Case Management Conference and deadline for filing the parties' Joint Statement in connection therewith are hereby CONTINUED to May 16, 2013 and May 9, 2013, respectively. Dated: _______________________ __________________________________ December 20, 2013 5 Judge Maxine M. Chesney 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION REGARDING SCHEDULE AND DEADLINES AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?