Armstrong v. Bauer's Intelligent Transportation, Inc.

Filing 23

STIPULATION REGARDING SCHEDULE AND DEADLINES AND ORDER. The parties' stipulation is approved, with the exception that the Further Case Management Conference and deadline for filing the parties' Joint Statementin connection therewith are hereby CONTINUED to May 16, 2013 and May 9, 2013, respectively. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on December 20, 2013. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/20/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

THE TIDRICK LAW FIRM
STEVEN G. TIDRICK, SBN 224760
JOEL B. YOUNG, SBN 236662
2039 Shattuck Avenue, Suite 308
Berkeley, California 94704
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-mail:
[e-mail]
E-mail:
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Individual and Representative
Plaintiff RORY ARMSTRONG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

RORY ARMSTRONG, on behalf of himself
and all others similarly situated,

11
12
13
14

Civil Case No.: 3:13-cv-02691-MMC
Removed from Superior Court of the State of
California, County of San Francisco
Civil Case No.: CGC-13-530147

Plaintiff,
v.

CLASS ACTION

BAUER’S INTELLIGENT
TRANSPORTATION, INC.; and DOES 1-50,

STIPULATION REGARDING
SCHEDULE AND DEADLINES AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER

Defendants.

15
16

Complaint Filed: March 29, 2013

17

First Amended Complaint Filed:
May 13, 2013

18

(N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 6-1(b)

19
20
21

Pursuant to Northern District of California Civil Local Rule 6-1(b), Plaintiff Rory

22

Armstrong and Defendant Bauer’s Intelligent Transportation, Inc. through their respective

23

counsel of record hereby stipulate as follows:

24

WHEREAS, the ADR session in this matter, consisting of Early Neutral Evaluation

25

and Mediation with the Court-appointed neutral Richard S. Whitmore, is currently scheduled

26

for January 8, 2014;

27
28

WHEREAS, the Court-appointed neutral Richard S. Whitmore supports the extension
requested herein;
1
STIPULATION REGARDING SCHEDULE AND DEADLINES AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

1
2
3
4
5

WHEREAS, the necessary discovery for the ADR session will not be completed by
January 8, 2014, but it will be by February 6, 2014;
WHEREAS, the Evaluator/Mediator, and counsel for both sides have communicated
and determined that the February 6, 2014 would work for all of them for the ADR session;
WHEREAS, a Court order is required to reschedule the ADR session because at the

6

initial case management conference, the Court ordered that ADR “commence no later than

7

120 days from 9/13/2013,” i.e., by January 13, 2014 (per Docket No. 16);

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

WHEREAS, at the initial case management conference, the Court also ordered that
Defendant’s dispositive motion on the issue of jurisdiction be filed by February 7, 2014 (per
Docket No. 16);
THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate as follows and request that the Court enter
the Proposed Order below:
1. The deadline for completion of ADR be extended from January 13, 2014 to
February 6, 2014.
2. The deadline for Defendant to file its dispositive motion on the issue of jurisdiction
is continued from February 7, 2014 to March 7, 2014.
3. The remainder of the schedule remains unchanged, including the Case

18

Management Statement due by April 11, 2014, and the Further Case Management

19

Conference set for April 18, 2014 10:30 AM (per Docket No. 16).

20

Dated: December 20, 2013

/s/ Steven G. Tidrick
__________________________
STEVEN G. TIDRICK, SBN 224760
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

THE TIDRICK LAW FIRM

Dated: December 20, 2013

LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
/s/ Aurelio J. Perez
__________________________
ROBERT G. HULTENG, SBN 071293
AURELIO J. PEREZ, SBN 282135
Attorneys for Defendant
2

STIPULATION REGARDING SCHEDULE AND DEADLINES AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

1
2
3
4

[PROPOSED] ORDER
The Parties having stipulated to the foregoing, IT IS SO ORDERED. , with the exception
that the Further Case Management Conference and deadline for filing the parties' Joint Statement
in connection therewith are hereby CONTINUED to May 16, 2013 and May 9, 2013, respectively.
Dated: _______________________
__________________________________
December 20, 2013

5

Judge Maxine M. Chesney

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3
STIPULATION REGARDING SCHEDULE AND DEADLINES AND [PROPOSED] ORDER