Armstrong v. Bauer's Intelligent Transportation, Inc.

Filing 29

STIPULATION AND ORDER. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on March 24, 2014. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/24/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 THE TIDRICK LAW FIRM STEVEN G. TIDRICK, SBN 224760 JOEL B. YOUNG, SBN 236662 2039 Shattuck Avenue, Suite 308 Berkeley, California 94704 Telephone: (510) 788-5100 Facsimile: (510) 291-3226 E-mail: E-mail: Attorneys for Individual and Representative Plaintiff RORY ARMSTRONG 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RORY ARMSTRONG, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, 14 Removed from San Francisco Superior Court, Civil Case No.: CGC-13-530147 Plaintiff, 12 13 Civil Case No.: 3:13-cv-02691-MMC v. CLASS ACTION BAUER'S INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION, INC.; and DOES 1-50, 15 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff Rory Armstrong ("Plaintiff') and Defendant Bauer's Intelligent 19 Transportation, Inc. ("Defendant") through their respective counsel of record hereby stipulate 20 as follows: 21 22 23 24 25 WHEREAS, the parties through their respective counsel have met-and-conferred regarding methods for conserving the resources of the parties and the Court; THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate as follows and request that the Court enter the Proposed Order below: 1. The overtime claims of Plaintiffs operative complaint (First Amended Collective 26 and Class Action Complaint, filed May 12, 2013, in Superior Court of the State of 27 California, County of San Francisco) ("F AC"), both under federal law and state 28 law, are dismissed with prejudice, and stricken, in exchange for Defendant's l STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED! ORDER March 24, 2014

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?