Armstrong v. Bauer's Intelligent Transportation, Inc.

Filing 29

STIPULATION AND ORDER. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on March 24, 2014. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/24/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6

THE TIDRICK LAW FIRM
STEVEN G. TIDRICK, SBN 224760
JOEL B. YOUNG, SBN 236662
2039 Shattuck Avenue, Suite 308
Berkeley, California 94704
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-mail:
[e-mail]
E-mail:
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Individual and Representative
Plaintiff RORY ARMSTRONG

7

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

RORY ARMSTRONG, on behalf of himself
and all others similarly situated,

14

Removed from San Francisco Superior Court,
Civil Case No.: CGC-13-530147

Plaintiff,

12
13

Civil Case No.: 3:13-cv-02691-MMC

v.

CLASS ACTION

BAUER'S INTELLIGENT
TRANSPORTATION, INC.; and DOES 1-50,

15

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER

Defendants.

16
17
18

Plaintiff Rory Armstrong ("Plaintiff') and Defendant Bauer's Intelligent

19

Transportation, Inc. ("Defendant") through their respective counsel of record hereby stipulate

20

as follows:

21
22
23
24
25

WHEREAS, the parties through their respective counsel have met-and-conferred
regarding methods for conserving the resources of the parties and the Court;
THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate as follows and request that the Court enter
the Proposed Order below:
1. The overtime claims of Plaintiffs operative complaint (First Amended Collective

26

and Class Action Complaint, filed May 12, 2013, in Superior Court of the State of

27

California, County of San Francisco) ("F AC"), both under federal law and state

28

law, are dismissed with prejudice, and stricken, in exchange for Defendant's
l
STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED! ORDER

March 24, 2014