Armstrong v. Bauer's Intelligent Transportation, Inc.

Filing 52

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 20, 2014. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/20/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6

THE TIDRICK LAW FIRM
STEVEN G. TIDRICK, SBN 224760
JOEL B. YOUNG, SBN 236662
2039 Shattuck Avenue, Suite 308
Berkeley, California 94704
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-mail:
[e-mail]
E-mail:
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Individual and Representative
Plaintiff RORY ARMSTRONG

7
8
9
10
11

ROBERT G. HULTENG, SBN 071293
AURELIO J. PEREZ, SBN 282135
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
650 California Street, 20th Floor
San Francisco, California 94108
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-mail:
[e-mail]
E-mail:
[e-mail]

12
13

Attorneys for Defendant BAUER’S
INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION, INC.

14
15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

16

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

17
18

RORY ARMSTRONG, on behalf of himself
and all others similarly situated,

19
20
21
22
23

Plaintiff,

Civil Case No.: 3:13-cv-02691-MMC
Removed from Superior Court of the State of
California, County of San Francisco
Civil Case No.: CGC-13-530147

v.
CLASS ACTION
BAUER’S INTELLIGENT
TRANSPORTATION, INC.; and DOES 1-50,
Defendants.

24

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
Complaint Filed: March 29, 2013
First Amended Complaint Filed:
May 13, 2013

25
26
27
28
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
650 California Street
20th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94108.2693
415.433.1940

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

CASE NO. 3:13-cv-02691-MMC

1

1.

PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS

2

Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of

3

confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure

4

and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly,

5

the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the court to enter the following Stipulated Protective

6

Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures

7

or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends

8

only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the

9

applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 12.3, below, that

10

this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential information under seal;

11

Civil Local Rule 79-5 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be

12

applied when a party seeks permission from the court to file material under seal.

13

2.

14
15

DEFINITIONS
2.1

Challenging Party:

a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of

information or items under this Order.

16

2.2

“CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items:

information (regardless of how it is

17

generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule of

18

Civil Procedure 26(c).

19
20

2.3

as their support staff).

21
22

Counsel (without qualifier): Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well

2.4

Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that it

produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL.”

23

2.5

Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the medium

24

or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, testimony,

25

transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or responses to

26

discovery in this matter.

27

///

28

///

LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
650 California Street
20th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94108.2693
415.433.1940

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

2.

CASE NO. 3:13-cv-02691-MMC

1

2.6

Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to

2

the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a

3

consultant in this action.

4
5

2.7

2.8

10

2.9

behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm which has appeared on behalf of that party.
2.10

Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, employees,

consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their support staffs).

13
14

Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a party to this action

but are retained to represent or advise a party to this action and have appeared in this action on

11
12

Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal

entity not named as a Party to this action.

8
9

attorneys who are employees of a party to this action. House

Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel.

6
7

House Counsel:

2.11

Producing Party:

a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery

Material in this action.

15

2.12

Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services

16

(e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and organizing,

17

storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and subcontractors.

18
19

2.13

Protected Material:

any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as

“CONFIDENTIAL.”

20

2.14

Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a

21

Producing Party.

22

3.

SCOPE

23

The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected Material (as

24

defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected Material; (2) all

25

copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony,

26

conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material.

27

However, the protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order do not cover the following

28

information: (a) any information that is in the public domain at the time of disclosure to a Receiving

LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
650 California Street
20th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94108.2693
415.433.1940

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

3.

CASE NO. 3:13-cv-02691-MMC

1

Party or becomes part of the public domain after its disclosure to a Receiving Party as a result of

2

publication not involving a violation of this Order, including becoming part of the public record

3

through trial or otherwise; and (b) any information known to the Receiving Party prior to the

4

disclosure or obtained by the Receiving Party after the disclosure from a source who obtained the

5

information lawfully and under no obligation of confidentiality to the Designating Party. Any use of

6

Protected Material at trial shall be governed by a separate agreement or order.

7

4.

DURATION

8

Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by this

9

Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court order

10

otherwise directs. Final disposition shall be deemed to be the later of (1) dismissal of all claims and

11

defenses in this action, with or without prejudice; and (2) final judgment herein after the completion

12

and exhaustion of all appeals, rehearings, remands, trials, or reviews of this action, including the

13

time limits for filing any motions or applications for extension of time pursuant to applicable law.

14

5.

15

DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL
5.1

Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. Each Party or

16

Non-Party that designates information or items for protection under this Order must take care to

17

limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate standards. The

18

Designating Party must designate for protection only those parts of material, documents, items, or

19

oral or written communications that qualify – so that other portions of the material, documents,

20

items, or communications for which protection is not warranted are not swept unjustifiably within

21

the ambit of this Order.

22

Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited. Designations that are shown

23

to be clearly unjustified or that have been made for an improper purpose (e.g., to unnecessarily

24

encumber or retard the case development process or to impose unnecessary expenses and burdens on

25

other parties) expose the Designating Party to sanctions.

26

If it comes to a Designating Party’s attention that information or items that it designated for

27

protection do not qualify for protection, that Designating Party must promptly notify all other Parties

28

that it is withdrawing the mistaken designation.

LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
650 California Street
20th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94108.2693
415.433.1940

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

4.

CASE NO. 3:13-cv-02691-MMC

1

5.2

Manner and Timing of Designations. Except as otherwise provided in this Order

2

(see, e.g., second paragraph of section 5.2(a) below), or as otherwise stipulated or ordered,

3

Disclosure or Discovery Material that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so

4

designated before the material is disclosed or produced.

5
6

Designation in conformity with this Order requires:
(a)

for information in documentary form (e.g., paper or electronic documents, but

7

excluding transcripts of depositions or other pretrial or trial proceedings), that the Producing Party

8

affix the legend “CONFIDENTIAL” to each page that contains protected material. If only a portion

9

or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly

10

identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

11

A Party or Non-Party that makes original documents or materials available for inspection

12

need not designate them for protection until after the inspecting Party has indicated which material it

13

would like copied and produced. During the inspection and before the designation, all of the material

14

made available for inspection shall be deemed “CONFIDENTIAL.” After the inspecting Party has

15

identified the documents it wants copied and produced, the Producing Party must determine which

16

documents, or portions thereof, qualify for protection under this Order. Then, before producing the

17

specified documents, the Producing Party must affix the “CONFIDENTIAL” legend to each page

18

that contains Protected Material. If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for

19

protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making

20

appropriate markings in the margins).

21

(b)

for testimony given in deposition or in other pretrial or trial proceedings, that

22

the Designating Party identify on the record, before the close of the deposition, hearing, or other

23

proceeding, all protected testimony.

24

(c)

for information produced in some form other than documentary and for any

25

other tangible items, that the Producing Party affix in a prominent place on the exterior of the

26

container or containers in which the information or item is stored the legend “CONFIDENTIAL.” If

27

only a portion or portions of the information or item warrant protection, the Producing Party, to the

28

extent practicable, shall identify the protected portion(s).

LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
650 California Street
20th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94108.2693
415.433.1940

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

5.

CASE NO. 3:13-cv-02691-MMC

1

5.3

Inadvertent Failures to Designate.

If timely corrected, an inadvertent failure to

2

designate qualified information or items does not, standing alone, waive the Designating Party’s

3

right to secure protection under this Order for such material. Upon timely correction of a

4

designation, the Receiving Party must make reasonable efforts to assure that the material is treated in

5

accordance with the provisions of this Order.

6

6.

7

CHALLENGING CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS
6.1

Timing of Challenges. Any Party or Non-Party may challenge a designation of

8

confidentiality at any time. Unless a prompt challenge to a Designating Party’s confidentiality

9

designation is necessary to avoid foreseeable, substantial unfairness, unnecessary economic burdens,

10

or a significant disruption or delay of the litigation, a Party does not waive its right to challenge a

11

confidentiality designation by electing not to mount a challenge promptly after the original

12

designation is disclosed.

13

6.2

Meet and Confer. The Challenging Party shall initiate the dispute resolution process

14

by providing written notice of each designation it is challenging and describing the basis for each

15

challenge. To avoid ambiguity as to whether a challenge has been made, the written notice must

16

recite that the challenge to confidentiality is being made in accordance with this specific paragraph

17

of the Protective Order. The parties shall attempt to resolve each challenge in good faith and must

18

begin the process by conferring directly (in voice to voice dialogue; other forms of communication

19

are not sufficient) within 14 days of the date of service of notice. In conferring, the Challenging

20

Party must explain the basis for its belief that the confidentiality designation was not proper and

21

must give the Designating Party an opportunity to review the designated material, to reconsider the

22

circumstances, and, if no change in designation is offered, to explain the basis for the chosen

23

designation. A Challenging Party may proceed to the next stage of the challenge process only if it

24

has engaged in this meet and confer process first or establishes that the Designating Party is

25

unwilling to participate in the meet and confer process in a timely manner.

26

6.3

Judicial Intervention.

If the Parties cannot resolve a challenge without court

27

intervention, the Designating Party shall file and serve a motion to retain confidentiality under Civil

28

Local Rule 7 (and in compliance with Civil Local Rule 79-5, if applicable) within 21 days of the

LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
650 California Street
20th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94108.2693
415.433.1940

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

6.

CASE NO. 3:13-cv-02691-MMC

1

initial notice of challenge or within 14 days of the parties agreeing that the meet and confer process

2

will not resolve their dispute, whichever is earlier. Each such motion must be accompanied by a

3

competent declaration affirming that the movant has complied with the meet and confer

4

requirements imposed in the preceding paragraph. Failure by the Designating Party to make such a

5

motion including the required declaration within 21 days (or 14 days, if applicable) shall

6

automatically waive the confidentiality designation for each challenged designation. In addition, the

7

Challenging Party may file a motion challenging a confidentiality designation at any time if there is

8

good cause for doing so, including a challenge to the designation of a deposition transcript or any

9

portions thereof. Any motion brought pursuant to this provision must be accompanied by a

10

competent declaration affirming that the movant has complied with the meet and confer

11

requirements imposed by the preceding paragraph.

12

The burden of persuasion in any such challenge proceeding shall be on the Designating

13

Party. Frivolous challenges, and those made for an improper purpose (e.g., to harass or impose

14

unnecessary expenses and burdens on other parties) may expose the Challenging Party to sanctions.

15

Unless the Designating Party has waived the confidentiality designation by failing to file a motion to

16

retain confidentiality as described above, all parties shall continue to afford the material in question

17

the level of protection to which it is entitled under the Producing Party’s designation until the court

18

rules on the challenge.

19

7.

20

ACCESS TO AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL
7.1

Basic Principles. A Receiving Party may use Protected Material that is disclosed or

21

produced by another Party or by a Non-Party in connection with this case only for prosecuting,

22

defending, or attempting to settle this litigation. Such Protected Material may be disclosed only to

23

the categories of persons and under the conditions described in this Order. When the litigation has

24

been terminated, a Receiving Party must comply with the provisions of section 13 below (FINAL

25

DISPOSITION).

26

Protected Material must be stored and maintained by a Receiving Party at a location and in a

27

secure manner that ensures that access is limited to the persons authorized under this Order.

28

///

LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
650 California Street
20th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94108.2693
415.433.1940

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

7.

CASE NO. 3:13-cv-02691-MMC

1

7.2

Disclosure of “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items. Unless otherwise ordered by

2

the court or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a Receiving Party may disclose any

3

information or item designated “CONFIDENTIAL” only to:

4

(a)

the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel of Record in this action, as well as

5

employees of said Outside Counsel of Record to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the

6

information for this litigation and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be

7

Bound” that is attached hereto as Exhibit A;

8
9
10

(b)

the officers, directors, and employees (including House Counsel) of the

Receiving Party to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed
the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A);

11

(c)

Experts (as defined in this Order) of the Receiving Party to whom disclosure

12

is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and

13

Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A);

14

(d)

the court and its personnel;

15

(e)

court reporters and their staff, professional jury or trial consultants, mock

16

jurors, and Professional Vendors to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and

17

who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A);

18

(f)

during their depositions, witnesses in the action to whom disclosure is

19

reasonably necessary and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound”

20

(Exhibit A), unless otherwise agreed by the Designating Party or ordered by the court. Pages of

21

transcribed deposition testimony or exhibits to depositions that reveal Protected Material must be

22

separately bound by the court reporter and may not be disclosed to anyone except as permitted under

23

this Stipulated Protective Order.

24

(g)

the author or recipient of a document containing the information or a

25

custodian or other person who otherwise possessed or knew the information.

26

///

27

///

28

///

LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
650 California Street
20th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94108.2693
415.433.1940

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

8.

CASE NO. 3:13-cv-02691-MMC

1

8.

PROTECTED MATERIAL SUBPOENAED OR ORDERED PRODUCED IN OTHER

2

LITIGATION

3

If a Party is served with a subpoena or a court order issued in other litigation that compels

4

disclosure of any information or items designated in this action as “CONFIDENTIAL,” that Party

5

must:

6
7

(a)

include a copy of the subpoena or court order;

8
9
10

(b)

promptly notify in writing the party who caused the subpoena or order to issue

in the other litigation that some or all of the material covered by the subpoena or order is subject to
this Protective Order. Such notification shall include a copy of this Stipulated Protective Order; and

11
12

promptly notify in writing the Designating Party. Such notification shall

(c)

cooperate with respect to all reasonable procedures sought to be pursued by

the Designating Party whose Protected Material may be affected.

13

If the Designating Party timely seeks a protective order, the Party served with the subpoena

14

or court order shall not produce any information designated in this action as “CONFIDENTIAL”

15

before a determination by the court from which the subpoena or order issued, unless the Party has

16

obtained the Designating Party’s permission. The Designating Party shall bear the burden and

17

expense of seeking protection in that court of its confidential material – and nothing in these

18

provisions should be construed as authorizing or encouraging a Receiving Party in this action to

19

disobey a lawful directive from another court.

20

9.

21

A NON-PARTY’S PROTECTED MATERIAL SOUGHT TO BE PRODUCED IN THIS
LITIGATION

22

(a) The terms of this Order are applicable to information produced by a Non-Party in this

23

action and designated as “CONFIDENTIAL.” Such information produced by Non-Parties in

24

connection with this litigation is protected by the remedies and relief provided by this Order.

25

Nothing in these provisions should be construed as prohibiting a Non-Party from seeking additional

26

protections.

27

///

28

///

LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
650 California Street
20th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94108.2693
415.433.1940

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

9.

CASE NO. 3:13-cv-02691-MMC

1

(b) In the event that a Party is required, by a valid discovery request, to produce a Non-

2

Party’s confidential information in its possession, and the Party is subject to an agreement with the

3

Non-Party not to produce the Non-Party’s confidential information, then the Party shall:

4
5

(1) promptly notify in writing the Requesting Party and the Non-Party that some or
all of the information requested is subject to a confidentiality agreement with a Non-Party;

6

(2) promptly provide the Non-Party with a copy of the Stipulated Protective Order in

7

this litigation, the relevant discovery request(s), and a reasonably specific description of the

8

information requested; and

9

(3) make the information requested available for inspection by the Non-Party.

10

(c) If the Non-Party fails to object or seek a protective order from this court within 14

11

days of receiving the notice and accompanying information, the Receiving Party may produce the

12

Non-Party’s confidential information responsive to the discovery request. If the Non-Party timely

13

seeks a protective order, the Receiving Party shall not produce any information in its possession or

14

control that is subject to the confidentiality agreement with the Non-Party before a determination by

15

the court. Absent a court order to the contrary, the Non-Party shall bear the burden and expense of

16

seeking protection in this court of its Protected Material.

17

10.

UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL

18

If a Receiving Party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has disclosed Protected

19

Material to any person or in any circumstance not authorized under this Stipulated Protective Order,

20

the Receiving Party must immediately (a) notify in writing the Designating Party of the unauthorized

21

disclosures, (b) use its best efforts to retrieve all unauthorized copies of the Protected Material, (c)

22

inform the person or persons to whom unauthorized disclosures were made of all the terms of this

23

Order, and (d) request such person or persons to execute the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to

24

Be Bound” that is attached hereto as Exhibit A.

25

11.

INADVERTENT PRODUCTION OF PRIVILEGED OR OTHERWISE PROTECTED

26

MATERIAL

27

When a Producing Party gives notice to Receiving Parties that certain inadvertently produced

28

material is subject to a claim of privilege or other protection, the obligations of the Receiving Parties

LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
650 California Street
20th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94108.2693
415.433.1940

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

10.

CASE NO. 3:13-cv-02691-MMC

1

are those set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(5)(B). This provision is not intended to

2

modify whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production

3

without prior privilege review. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d) and (e), insofar as the

4

parties reach an agreement on the effect of disclosure of a communication or information covered by

5

the attorney-client privilege or work product protection, the parties may incorporate their agreement

6

in the stipulated protective order submitted to the court.

7

12.

8
9

MISCELLANEOUS
12.1

Right to Further Relief. Nothing in this Order abridges the right of any person to seek

its modification by the court in the future.

10

12.2

Right to Assert Other Objections. By stipulating to the entry of this Protective Order

11

no Party waives any right it otherwise would have to object to disclosing or producing any

12

information or item on any ground not addressed in this Stipulated Protective Order. Similarly, no

13

Party waives any right to object on any ground to use in evidence of any of the material covered by

14

this Protective Order.

15

12.3

Filing Protected Material. Without written permission from the Designating Party or a

16

court order secured after appropriate notice to all interested persons, a Party may not file in the

17

public record in this action any Protected Material. A Party that seeks to file under seal any Protected

18

Material must comply with Civil Local Rule 79-5. Protected Material may only be filed under seal

19

pursuant to a court order authorizing the sealing of the specific Protected Material at issue. Pursuant

20

to Civil Local Rule 79-5, a sealing order will issue only upon a request establishing that the

21

Protected Material at issue is privileged, protectable as a trade secret, or otherwise entitled to

22

protection under the law. If a Receiving Party's request to file Protected Material under seal pursuant

23

to Civil Local Rule 79-5(d) is denied by the court, then the Receiving Party may file the information

24

in the public record pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5(e) unless otherwise instructed by the court.

25

13.

FINAL DISPOSITION

26

Within 60 days after the final disposition of this action, as defined in paragraph 4, each

27

Receiving Party must return all Protected Material to the Producing Party or destroy such material.

28

As used in this subdivision, “all Protected Material” includes all copies, abstracts, compilations,

LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
650 California Street
20th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94108.2693
415.433.1940

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

11.

CASE NO. 3:13-cv-02691-MMC

1

summaries, and any other format reproducing or capturing any of the Protected Material. Whether

2

the Protected Material is returned or destroyed, the Receiving Party must submit a written

3

certification to the Producing Party (and, if not the same person or entity, to the Designating Party)

4

by the 60 day deadline that (1) identifies (by category, where appropriate) all the Protected Material

5

that was returned or destroyed and (2) affirms that the Receiving Party has not retained any copies,

6

abstracts, compilations, summaries or any other format reproducing or capturing any of the Protected

7

Material. Notwithstanding this provision, Counsel are entitled to retain an archival copy of all

8

pleadings, motion papers, trial, deposition, and hearing transcripts, legal memoranda,

9

correspondence, deposition and trial exhibits, expert reports, attorney work product, and consultant

10

and expert work product, even if such materials contain Protected Material. Any such archival copies

11

that contain or constitute Protected Material remain subject to this Protective Order as set forth in

12

Section 4 (DURATION).

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
650 California Street
20th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94108.2693
415.433.1940

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

12.

CASE NO. 3:13-cv-02691-MMC

1
2

IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.
DATED: August 14, 2014

3

By: /s/ Steven G. Tidrick
STEVEN G. TIDRICK, SBN 224760
JOEL B. YOUNG, SBN 236662
THE TIDRICK LAW FIRM
2039 Shattuck Avenue, Suite 308
Berkeley, California 94704
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-mail:
[e-mail]
E-mail:
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Individual and Representative
Plaintiff RORY ARMSTRONG

4
5
6
7
8
9
10

THE TIDRICK LAW FIRM

DATED: August 14, 2014

11

LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
By: /s/ Aurelio J. Perez
ROBERT G. HULTENG, SBN 071293
AURELIO J. PEREZ, SBN 282135
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
650 California Street, 20th Floor
San Francisco, California 94108
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant BAUER’S
INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION, INC.

12
13
14
15
16

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

17
18
19

Dated:

August 20, 2014
Honorable Maxine M. Chesney
United States District Court Judge

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
650 California Street
20th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94108.2693
415.433.1940

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

13.

CASE NO. 3:13-cv-02691-MMC

1

EXHIBIT A

2

ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND

3

I, _____________________________ [print or type full name], of _____________________

4

_______________________________________ [print or type full address], declare under penalty of

5

perjury that I have read in its entirety and understand the Stipulated Protective Order that was issued

6

by the United States District Court for the Northern District of California on _____________[date]

7

in the case of Rory Armstrong v. Bauer's Intelligent Transportation, Inc., Case No. 3:13-cv-02691-

8

MMC. I agree to comply with and to be bound by all the terms of this Stipulated Protective Order

9

and I understand and acknowledge that failure to so comply could expose me to sanctions and

10

punishment in the nature of contempt. I solemnly promise that I will not disclose in any manner any

11

information or item that is subject to this Stipulated Protective Order to any person or entity except

12

in strict compliance with the provisions of this Order.

13

I further agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Northern District

14

of California for the purpose of enforcing the terms of this Stipulated Protective Order, even if such

15

enforcement proceedings occur after termination of this action.

16

I hereby appoint __________________________ [print or type full name] of ____________________

17

_______________________________________ [print or type full address and telephone number] as

18

my California agent for service of process in connection with this action or any proceedings related to

19

enforcement of this Stipulated Protective Order.

20
21

Date: ______________________________________

22

City and State where sworn and signed: _________________________________

23
24

Printed name: _______________________________

25
26

Signature: __________________________________

27
Firmwide:128196814.1 053752.1012

28
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
650 California Street
20th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94108.2693
415.433.1940

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

14.

CASE NO. 3:13-cv-02691-MMC