Scott
Filing
7
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. The action is DISMISSED without prejudice; the Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of defendant and close the file. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 07/31/2013. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/31/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MICHAEL SCOTT,
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Plaintiff,
Case No. 13-2719 WHO (PR)
12
v.
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
13
14
15
JOHN DOE,
Defendant.
16
17
18
Plaintiff has failed to comply with the Court’s order to (1) file a complete
19
application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), or (2) pay the full filing fee of $350.00.
20
Accordingly, the action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failing to respond to the
21
Court’s order, and for failure to prosecute, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Because this
22
dismissal is without prejudice, plaintiff may move to reopen the action. Any such motion
23
must contain (1) a complete IFP application, or (2) the full filing fee of $350.00. The
24
Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of defendant, and close the file.
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 31, 2013
_________________________
WILLIAM H. ORRICK
United States District Judge
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MICHAEL SCOTT,
Case Number: CV13-02719 WHO
Plaintiff,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
v.
John Doe,
Defendant.
/
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District
Court, Northern District of California.
That on July 31, 2013, I SERVED a true and correct copy of the attached, by placing said copy in
a postage paid envelope addressed to the person hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in
the U.S. Mail.
Michael Scott 683064
Michael Unit
2664 FM 2054
Tennessee Colony, TX 75886
Dated: July 31, 2013
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
By: Jean Davis, Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?