Hopkins v. State of California
Filing
12
ORDER re 11 Request filed by Randell Hopkins. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 8/8/2013. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/12/2013)
Hopkins v. State of California
Doc. 12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
)
)
)
)
In re RANDELL HOPKINS, V97737,
)
)
)
Plaintiff.
)
)
___________________________________ )
No. C 13-2725 CRB (PR)
ORDER
(Docket #11)
16
17
On June 13, 2013, the clerk filed as a new prisoner action a letter by
18
plaintiff complaining of inadequate medical care. On that same date, the court
19
notified plaintiff in writing that the action was deficient because he did not file an
20
actual complaint or pay the requisite filing fee or, instead, submit a signed and
21
completed court-approved in forma pauperis (IFP) application. Plaintiff was
22
advised that failure to file the requested items within 30 days would result in
23
dismissal of the action.
24
On July 30, 2013, the court dismissed the actions without prejudice because
25
more than 40 days had elapsed and plaintiff had not provided the court with the
26
requisite items or sought an extension of time to do so.
27
28
Plaintiff has filed a request for reconsideration noting that he was
“transferred out” to another prison until June 21, 2013. Plaintiff’s request for
Dockets.Justia.com
1
reconsideration is denied. But because the dismissal of the action was without
2
prejudice, plaintiff is free to file a new action using the court’s complaint form.
3
The clerk is instructed to send plaintiff a blank complaint form.
4
SO ORDERED.
5
DATED: Aug. 8, 2013
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
G:\PRO-SE\CRB\CR.13\Hopkins, R.13-2725.recon.wpd
_________________________
CHARLES R. BREYER
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?