American Small Business League v. United States Department of the Army
Filing
5
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 4 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER RE EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 07/19/2013. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/18/2013)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
AMERICAN SMALL BUSINESS
LEAGUE,
Plaintiff,
8
9
10
11
Case No. 13-cv-02736-WHO
v.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
THE ARMY,
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION
FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR
DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO
COMPLAINT
Re: Dkt. No. 4
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Defendant.
12
13
Defendant United States Department of the Army (“Defendant”) and Plaintiff American
14
Small Business League (“Plaintiff”), by and through their respective counsel, stipulate to extend
15
the time for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(a) of
16
the Northern District of California as follows:
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
1.
On June 14, 2013, Plaintiff filed its Complaint for Injunctive Relief under
the Freedom of Information Act (“Complaint”);
2.
On July 1, 2013, the U.S. Attorney’s Office was served with Plaintiff’s
Complaint by certified mail;
3.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(4)(C), Defendant’s response to the Complaint
is presently due to be filed and served on July 31, 2013;
4.
The parties have agreed to a 30-day extension of time for Defendant to
respond to the Complaint from July 31, 2012 to August 31, 2013;
25
5.
No prior extensions of time have been requested or granted; and
26
6.
This change will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already
27
28
fixed by Court order.
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff and
1
Defendant that Defendant will have until August 31, 2013, to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint.
2
3
DATED: July 18, 2013
Respectfully submitted,
4
____/s/ Robert E. Belshaw _______
5
ROBERT E. BELSHAW
6
Attorneys for Plaintiff
7
8
MELINDA HAAG
9
United States Attorney
____/s/ Rebecca Falk____________
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
10
REBECCA FALK1
12
Assistant United States Attorney
13
Attorneys for Defendant
14
15
16
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 18, 2013
17
______________________________________
WILLIAM H. ORRICK
United States District Judge
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
1
27
28
I, Rebecca A. Falk, hereby attest, in accordance with the Civil L.R. 5(i)(3), the concurrence in the
filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatory listed here.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?