American Small Business League v. United States Department of the Army

Filing 5

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 4 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER RE EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 07/19/2013. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/18/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 AMERICAN SMALL BUSINESS LEAGUE, Plaintiff, 8 9 10 11 Case No. 13-cv-02736-WHO v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT Re: Dkt. No. 4 United States District Court Northern District of California Defendant. 12 13 Defendant United States Department of the Army (“Defendant”) and Plaintiff American 14 Small Business League (“Plaintiff”), by and through their respective counsel, stipulate to extend 15 the time for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(a) of 16 the Northern District of California as follows: 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 1. On June 14, 2013, Plaintiff filed its Complaint for Injunctive Relief under the Freedom of Information Act (“Complaint”); 2. On July 1, 2013, the U.S. Attorney’s Office was served with Plaintiff’s Complaint by certified mail; 3. Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(4)(C), Defendant’s response to the Complaint is presently due to be filed and served on July 31, 2013; 4. The parties have agreed to a 30-day extension of time for Defendant to respond to the Complaint from July 31, 2012 to August 31, 2013; 25 5. No prior extensions of time have been requested or granted; and 26 6. This change will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already 27 28 fixed by Court order. THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff and 1 Defendant that Defendant will have until August 31, 2013, to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint. 2 3 DATED: July 18, 2013 Respectfully submitted, 4 ____/s/ Robert E. Belshaw _______ 5 ROBERT E. BELSHAW 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff 7 8 MELINDA HAAG 9 United States Attorney ____/s/ Rebecca Falk____________ 11 United States District Court Northern District of California 10 REBECCA FALK1 12 Assistant United States Attorney 13 Attorneys for Defendant 14 15 16 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 18, 2013 17 ______________________________________ WILLIAM H. ORRICK United States District Judge 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 1 27 28 I, Rebecca A. Falk, hereby attest, in accordance with the Civil L.R. 5(i)(3), the concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatory listed here. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?