Page v. Grand Home Holdings Inc.
Filing
16
ORDER TO MEET AND CONFER AND SUBMIT JOINT DISCOVERY PLAN. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 10/7/13. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/7/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
DARREN PAGE, individually and on behalf
12 of all others similarly situated,
13
14
Plaintiff,
No. 13-cv-02754 NC
ORDER TO MEET AND
CONFER AND SUBMIT JOINT
DISCOVERY PLAN
v.
15 GRAND HOME HOLDINGS INC. DBA
Re: Dkt. Nos. 14, 15
BARBEQUES GALORE; and DOES 1–10,
16 inclusive,
17
Defendants.
18
19
20
On September 11, 2013, the parties attended a case management conference during
21 which the Court ordered the parties to meet and confer and submit a proposed discovery
22 plan. See Dkt. No. 13. Plaintiff submitted a proposed discovery plan on September 25,
23 2013. Dkt. No. 14. One day later, defendant filed a status report, asserting that the parties
24 have not met and conferred on plaintiff’s proposed discovery plan and requesting an
25 additional 14 days to meet and confer and submit a joint discovery plan. Dkt. No. 15.
26
By October 18, 2013, the parties must meet and confer and submit jointly a proposed
27 discovery plan with respect to the portions that have been agreed upon. With respect to
28 any remaining areas of disagreement, the parties must file by the same date a joint letter
Case No. 13-cv-02754 NC
ORDER TO MEET AND CONFER AND
SUBMIT JOINT DISCOVERY PLAN
e
C
nding order.
1 brief in compliance with this Court’s stan
2
IT IS SO OR
T
RDERED.
3
Date: Octobe 7, 2013
er
4
____
__________
__________
_____
Nath
hanael M. C
Cousins
Unit States M
ted
Magistrate J
Judge
5
6
7
8
9
10
0
11
1
12
2
13
3
14
4
15
5
16
6
17
7
18
8
19
9
20
0
21
1
22
2
23
3
24
4
25
5
26
6
27
7
28
8
Case No. 13-cv-0275 NC
54
ORDER TO MEET AND CONF
R
FER AND
SUBMIT JOINT DISCOVERY PLAN
T
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?