Marman v. U.S. Airways et al
Filing
48
ORDER granting 46 STIPULATION re 45 Clerk's Notice, (JOINT STIPULATION REQUESTING CONTINUANCE OF FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE) filed by Phyllis Guss-Davis, Johanna Ellison, Dominic Currieri, U.S. Airways. Further Case Management Conference reset for 11/7/2014 08:30 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 10/10/2014. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/15/2014)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
4
5
DESHON MARMAN
Plaintiffs,
6
7
8
9
10
11
Case No. CV-13-2755 CRB
v.
US AIRWAYS, an Arizona Corporation;
DOMINIC CURRIERI, PHYLLIS GUSSDAVIS, JOHANNA ELLISON and John &
Jane Does 3-10 (airline employees); Officer
CALVIN TOM, #821, police officer, John
& Jane DOES 11-30 (police officers and/or
municipalities), and the CITY AND
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO,
ORDER GRANTING JOINT
STIPULATION REQUESTING
CONTINUANCE OF FURTHER CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
CMC Date: October 17, 2014
Time: 8:30 A.M.
Courtroom: 6
Judge: Hon. Charles R. Breyer
12
Defendants.
13
14
15
This Court has reviewed the Parties’ Joint Stipulation Requesting Continuance of Further
16
Case Management Conference. Good cause appearing therein, it is hereby ordered that Further
17
Case Management Conference currently set for October 17, 2014 at 8:30 A.M., is continued to
18
November 7, 2014, at 8:30 A.M. The parties shall file a further case management conference
19
statement on October 10, 2014.
20
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
S
28
R NIA
FO
ER
H
27
RT
26
NO
25
Dated: October 10, 2014
LI
24
ERED
______________________________________
O ORD
IT IS S
CHARLES R. BREYER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
er
R. Brey
Charles
Judge
A
23
RT
U
O
22
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
UNIT
ED
21
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
JOINT STIP. REQUESTING CONTINUANCE
OF FURTHER CMC
CASE NO. CV-13-2755 CRB
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?