Marman v. U.S. Airways et al

Filing 48

ORDER granting 46 STIPULATION re 45 Clerk's Notice, (JOINT STIPULATION REQUESTING CONTINUANCE OF FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE) filed by Phyllis Guss-Davis, Johanna Ellison, Dominic Currieri, U.S. Airways. Further Case Management Conference reset for 11/7/2014 08:30 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 10/10/2014. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/15/2014)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 4 5 DESHON MARMAN Plaintiffs, 6 7 8 9 10 11 Case No. CV-13-2755 CRB v. US AIRWAYS, an Arizona Corporation; DOMINIC CURRIERI, PHYLLIS GUSSDAVIS, JOHANNA ELLISON and John & Jane Does 3-10 (airline employees); Officer CALVIN TOM, #821, police officer, John & Jane DOES 11-30 (police officers and/or municipalities), and the CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION REQUESTING CONTINUANCE OF FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE CMC Date: October 17, 2014 Time: 8:30 A.M. Courtroom: 6 Judge: Hon. Charles R. Breyer 12 Defendants. 13 14 15 This Court has reviewed the Parties’ Joint Stipulation Requesting Continuance of Further 16 Case Management Conference. Good cause appearing therein, it is hereby ordered that Further 17 Case Management Conference currently set for October 17, 2014 at 8:30 A.M., is continued to 18 November 7, 2014, at 8:30 A.M. The parties shall file a further case management conference 19 statement on October 10, 2014. 20 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. S 28 R NIA FO ER H 27 RT 26 NO 25 Dated: October 10, 2014 LI 24 ERED ______________________________________ O ORD IT IS S CHARLES R. BREYER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE er R. Brey Charles Judge A 23 RT U O 22 S DISTRICT TE C TA UNIT ED 21 N F D IS T IC T O R C JOINT STIP. REQUESTING CONTINUANCE OF FURTHER CMC CASE NO. CV-13-2755 CRB

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?