Marman v. U.S. Airways et al

Filing 51

ORDER re 50 Notice filed by Phyllis Guss-Davis, Johanna Ellison, Dominic Currieri, U.S. Airways., Reset Deadlines - Motion SJ due by 1/9/2015. Responses due by 1/30/2015. Replies due by 2/13/2015. Motion Hearing set for 2/20/2015 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Charles R. Breyer. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 11/12/2014. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/13/2014)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

4
5

DESHON MARMAN
Plaintiffs,

6
7
8
9
10
11

Case No. CV-13-2755 CRB
ORDER RE: CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE

v.
US AIRWAYS, an Arizona Corporation;
DOMINIC CURRIERI, PHYLLIS GUSSDAVIS, JOHANNA ELLISON and John &
Jane Does 3-10 (airline employees); Officer
CALVIN TOM, #821, police officer, John
& Jane DOES 11-30 (police officers and/or
municipalities), and the CITY AND
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO,

CMC Date: November 7, 2014
Time: 8:30 A.M.
Courtroom: 6
Judge: Hon. Charles R. Breyer

12
Defendants.
13
14
15

A Case Management Conference was held in this case on November 7, 2014. Counsel for

16

Defendant US Airways, Inc. (“US Airways”) Adam P. KohSweeney, attended. Counsel for

17

Plaintiff Deshon Marman did not attend. The Court hereby adopts the schedule set forth in the

18

parties’ Joint Case Management Statement, dated October 10, 2014 (dkt. 47).

19
20

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties will complete discovery and briefing on
Defendant US Airways’ Motion for Summary Judgment as follows:

21
Item

Date

Deposition of Dominic Currieri

Completed in Phoenix, Arizona by
December 12, 2014

Airline Defendants’ Motion for
Summary Judgment

January 9, 2015

Plaintiff’s Opposition to Motion for
Summary Judgment

January 30, 2015

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
CASE NO. CV-13-2755 CRB

1

Airline Defendants’ Reply in
Support of Summary Judgment

February 13, 2015

Hearing on Airline Defendants’
Motion for Summary Judgment

February 20, 2015 at 10:00AM, or
as soon thereafter as may be
convenient for the Court

2
3
4
5
6

RT

12

J

ER

14

R NIA

A

H

13

. Breyer

arles R
udge Ch

NO

11

FO

10

______________________________________
D RED
CHARLES R.E
SO OR BREYER
IT IS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

LI

9

Dated: November 12, 2014

UNIT
ED

8

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

S

7

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
CASE NO. CV-13-2755 CRB