Marman v. U.S. Airways et al
Filing
53
ORDER granting 52 STIPULATION re 51 Order (JOINT STIPULATION REQUESTING EXTENSION OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS US AIRWAYS, INC., DOMINIC CURRIERI, PHYLLIS GUSS-DAVIS AND JOHANNA ELL filed by Phyllis Guss-Davis, et al. Motion for SJ due by 3/9/2015. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 1/12/2015. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/12/2015)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
4
5
DESHON MARMAN
Plaintiffs,
6
7
8
9
10
11
Case No. CV-13-2755 CRB
v.
US AIRWAYS, an Arizona Corporation;
DOMINIC CURRIERI, PHYLLIS GUSSDAVIS, JOHANNA ELLISON and John &
Jane Does 3-10 (airline employees); Officer
CALVIN TOM, #821, police officer, John
& Jane DOES 11-30 (police officers and/or
municipalities), and the CITY AND
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO,
ORDER GRANTING JOINT
STIPULATION REQUESTING
EXTENSION OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE
ON DEFENDANTS US AIRWAYS, INC.,
DOMINIC CURRIERI, PHYLLIS GUSSDAVIS AND JOHANNA ELLISON’S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Judge: Hon. Charles R. Breyer
12
Defendants.
13
14
15
This Court has reviewed the Parties’ Joint Stipulation Requesting Extension of Briefing
16
Schedule on Defendants US Airways, Inc., Dominic Currieri, Phyllis Guss-Davis and Johanna
17
Ellison’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Good cause appearing therein, it is hereby ordered that
18
the schedule is revised as follows:
19
20
21
22
Airline Defendants’ Motion for
Summary Judgment
Due March 9, 2015
Plaintiff’s Opposition to Motion for
Summary Judgment
Due twenty-one (21) calendar days
following the filing of the Airline
Defendants’ Motion for Summary
Judgment.
Airline Defendants’ Reply in
Support of Summary Judgment
Due fourteen (14) calendar days
following the filing of Plaintiff’s
Opposition.
Hearing on Airline Defendants’
Motion for Summary Judgment
To be reserved, based on the date
the Airline Defendants’ Motion for
Summary Judgment is filed.
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIP.
REQUESTING EXT. OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE
CASE NO. CV-13-2755 CRB
1
Prior to filing the Motion for Summary Judgment, counsel for the Airline Defendants will
2
meet-and-confer with counsel for Plaintiff to ensure that the resulting briefing schedule and
3
hearing date is workable based on the parties’ respective schedules.
4
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
harles
Judge C
NO
10
RT
11
ER
H
12
13
er
R. Brey
FO
9
R NIA
______________________________________
ERED
CHARLES R. RD
S SO O BREYER
IT I
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: January 12, 2015
LI
8
UNIT
ED
7
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
S
6
A
5
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIP.
REQUESTING EXT. OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE
CASE NO. CV-13-2755 CRB
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?