Arroyo v. Unigard Insurance Company

Filing 20

ORDER GRANTING 16 STIPULATION selecting Private ADR. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 9/25/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/25/2013)

Download PDF
Case 3-13-cv-02810-JSW Document 16 Filed in CAND on 09/06/2013 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA PEDRO ARROYO , Plaintiff(s), v. UNIGARD INSURANCE , COMPANY Defendant(s). _______________________________/ CASE NO. ______________ 3:13-cv-02810-JSW STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Court Processes: 9 Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) 9 Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) 9 Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) (Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) Private Process: ✔ 9 Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________ JAMS, San Francisco, or BASF Mediation Services _____________________________________________________________________________ The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: 9 the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. ) ✔ 9 90 days from the date of the ruling on the motions other requested deadline _____________________________________________ referenced in Paragraph 4 of the Joint Case Management Conference Statement 9/6/2013 Dated:___________ 9/6/2013 Dated:____________ CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE ____________________________ /s/ John D. Green Attorney for Plaintiff ____________________________ /s/ Jeffrey Kaufman Attorney for Defendant ECF ATTESTATION I, John D. Green, am the ECF User whose ID and Password are being used to file this STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS. In compliance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that all signatories hereto have concurred in this filing. DATED: 9/6/2013 /s/ John D. Green Case 3-13-cv-02810-JSW Document 16 Filed in CAND on 09/06/2013 Page 2 of 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER 9 9 The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED. The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 25, 2013 __________________________________ MAGISTRATE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DISTRICT When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket Event, e.g., “Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation.” Rev. 12/11 Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?