Arroyo v. Unigard Insurance Company

Filing 37

ORDER GRANTING 36 STIPULATION for Leave to File Excess Pages. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 2/25/14. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/25/2014)

Case3:13-cv-02810-JSW Document36 Filed02/24/14 Page1 of 4

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

John D. Green (State Bar No. 121498)
[e-mail]
Thomas B. Mayhew (State Bar No. 183539)
[e-mail]
Eric C. Tausend (State Bar No. 273024)
[e-mail]
Farella Braun + Martel LLP
235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant
PEDRO ARROYO

8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
PEDRO ARROYO, an individual,

Case No. 3:13-cv-02810-JSW

12
Plaintiff,
13
vs.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO EXCEED PAGE
LIMITATIONS

14
15

UNIGARD INSURANCE COMPANY, a
Washington Corporation,
Defendant.

16
17
18

21
22

May 9, 2014
9:00 a.m.
11
Hon. Jeffrey S. White

UNIGARD INSURANCE COMPANY, a
Wisconsin Corporation,
Counterclaimant,

19
20

Date:
Time:
Courtroom:
Judge:

vs.
PEDRO ARROYO, an individual,
Counterdefendant.

23
24
25
26
27
28
Farella Braun + Martel LLP
235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
[phone]

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITATIONS
3:13-cv-02810-JSW

26297\4141691.1

Case3:13-cv-02810-JSW Document36 Filed02/24/14 Page2 of 4

1

WHEREAS, after a September 27, 2013 Case Management Conference, the Court set a

2

schedule for the parties to file their respective cross-motions for summary judgment or partial

3

summary judgment;

4
5
6

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Court’s order, on December 6, 2013 Plaintiff Pedro Arroyo
(“Arroyo”) filed his opening motion;
WHEREAS, with Arroyo’s consent, Unigard Insurance Company (“Unigard”) sought

7

leave to file a 30-page brief combining its opposition to Arroyo’s motion and its opening motion.

8

The Court granted leave for Unigard to file a combined 30-page brief, and on January 31, 2014

9

Unigard filed its combined opposition to Arroyo’s motion and its cross-motion, which was

10
11

30 pages;
WHEREAS, Arroyo’s combined reply in support of his motion and opposition to

12

Unigard’s cross-motion is due on March 7, 2014. The Court ordered that Arroyo file one brief

13

combining both its reply and its opposition;

14

WHEREAS, pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-11, Arroyo submits that good cause exists to allow

15

his combined reply brief and opposition brief to exceed the 25-page limit because (1) 25 pages is

16

otherwise insufficient because of the complexity of the case and the importance of the issues

17

within the case; and (2) the parties agreed to a 30-page limit for Unigard’s combined opposition

18

and opening brief, and at the same time, for the sake of reciprocity, agreed to a 30-page limit for

19

Arroyo’s combined reply and opposition brief;

20

NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate, and respectfully request that the Court

21

so order, that Arroyo may file a 30-page combined brief, which includes his reply in support of

22

his motion for partial summary judgment as well as his opposition to Unigard’s cross-motion for

23

summary judgment, or in the alternative, partial summary judgment.

24

Dated: February 24, 2014

25

By: /s/ John D. Green
John D. Green
Attorneys for Plaintiff and
Counterdefendant
PEDRO ARROYO

26
27
28
Farella Braun + Martel LLP
235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
[phone]

FARELLA BRAUN + MARTEL LLP

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITATIONS
3:13-cv-02810-JSW

-2-

26297\4141691.1

Case3:13-cv-02810-JSW Document36 Filed02/24/14 Page3 of 4

1

Dated: February 24, 2014

BRYDON HUGO & PARKER

2
By: /s/
John R. Brydon
Jeffrey Kaufman
Thomas J. Moses
Attorneys for Defendant and
Counterclaimant
UNIGARD INSURANCE COMPANY

3
4
5
6

ORDER

7
8
9

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that Plaintiff Pedro Arroyo may
file a 30-page combined brief which includes his reply in support of his motion for partial

10

summary judgment as well as his opposition to Unigard Insurance Company’s cross-motion for

11

summary judgment, or in the alternative, partial summary judgment

12

DATED: February 25, 2014

13
14

Jeffrey S. White
United States District Judge

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Farella Braun + Martel LLP
235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
[phone]

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITATIONS
3:13-cv-02810-JSW

-3-

26297\4141691.1