Shaw v. West El Camino Properties, L.P. et al

Filing 12

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 11 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER STIPULATION TO STAY INSPECTION PENDING SETTLEMENT NEGOTIATIONS filed by Sunnyvale/Santa Clara El Pollo Loco, LLC, West El Camino Properties, L.P. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on October 4, 2013. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/4/2013)

Download PDF
1 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP MELISSA T. DAUGHERTY, SB# 227451 E-Mail: Melissa.Daugherty@lewisbrisbois.com 2 221 North Figueroa Street, Suite 1200 3 Los Angeles, California 90012 Telephone: 213.250.1800 4 Facsimile: 213.250.7900 5 JESSICA A. LUKE, SB# 273047 E-Mail: Jessica.Luke@lewisbrisbois.com 6 333 Bush Street, Suite 1100 San Francisco, California 94104-2872 7 Telephone: 415.362.2580 Facsimile: 415.434.0882 8 Attorneys for Defendant 9 WEST EL CAMINO PROPERTIES, L.P.; SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL POLLO 10 LOCO, LLC 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 15 16 CECIL SHAW, CASE NO. CV13-02823 JST 17 Plaintiff, 18 vs. STIPULATION TO STAY INSPECTION PENDING SETTLEMENT NEGOTIATIONS 19 WEST EL CAMINO PROPERTIES, L.P.; 20 SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL POLLO LOCO, LLC, 21 Defendants. 22 Trial Date: None Set 23 Plaintiff CECIL SHAW (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants WEST EL CAMINO PROPERTIES, 24 25 L.P., and SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL POLLO LOCO, LLC, (“Defendants”), through 26 their counsel of record and pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, stipulate to stay the inspection 27 pending settlement negotiations. . LEWI S BRISBO IS BISGAAR D 28 / / / 4815-1993-9606.1 CV13-02823 JST STIPULATION TO STAY INSPECTION PENDING SETTLEMENT NEGOTIATIONS 1 2 STIPULATION WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to a stay on the Joint Site Inspection and all deadlines 3 flowing from that date in order to engage in settlement discussions; 4 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs originally filed this action on June 19, 2013; 5 WHEREAS, pursuant to the Scheduling Order For Cases Asserting Denial of Right of 6 Access Under Americans With Disabilities Act Title II & III (U.S.C. §§12131-89) the Parties are 7 to conduct a joint site inspection by October 2, 2013; 8 WHEREAS, upon mutual agreement, Plaintiff and Defendants stipulate and agree to a 9 thirty (30) day stay on the site inspection and all deadlines flowing from that date, including the 10 meet and confer deadline and mediation deadline in order to facilitate settlement negotiations; 11 WHEREAS, this extension of time will alter the following deadlines set by the Court: Last 12 Day for Joint Site Inspection (10/2/2013); Last Day for Parties to Meet and Confer in Person to 13 Discuss Settlement (28 days after joint inspection); and Last day for Plaintiff to file “Notice of 14 Need for Mediation” (42 days after joint site inspection); 15 ACCORDINGLY, Plaintiff and Defendants hereby stipulate to an extension of time to 16 November 1, 2013 to hold the Joint Site Inspection. 17 18 19 DATED: October 2, 2013 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP 20 21 By: /s/ Jessica A. Luke Melissa T. Daugherty Jessica A. Luke Attorneys for Defendants WEST EL CAMINO PROPERTIES, L.P., and SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL POLLO LOCO, LLC 22 23 24 25 26 27 LEWI S BRISBO IS BISGAAR D 28 4815-1993-9606.1 CV13-02823 JST 2 STIPULATION TO STAY INSPECTION PENDING SETTLEMENT NEGOTIATIONS 1 DATED: October 2, 2013 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C. 2 3 By: 4 5 6 /s/ Tanya E. Moore Tanya E. Moore Attorney for Plaintiff CECIL SHAW 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED that the Joint Site Inspection will be continued for thirty (30) days 10 to enable the Parties to engage in settlement discussions. S 13 ___________________________________ ERED O IT IS S ORD 14 NO RT ER 17 18 . Ti ga r A H 16 nS J u d ge J o LI 15 R NIA DATED: October 4, 2013 ______________ UNIT ED 12 RT U O 11 S DISTRICT TE C TA FO 9 N F D IS T IC T O R C 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 LEWI S BRISBO IS BISGAAR D 28 4815-1993-9606.1 CV13-02823 JST 3 STIPULATION TO STAY INSPECTION PENDING SETTLEMENT NEGOTIATIONS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?