Rivera v. Grounds et al

Filing 3

ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 07/30/2013. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/31/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 AUGUSTINE RIVERA, 12 Petitioner, 13 No. C-13-2851 TEH (PR) ORDER OF DISMISSAL v. 14 R. GROUNDS, Warden, et al., 15 Respondents. / 16 17 Petitioner Augustine Rivera, an inmate at the California 18 Correctional Training Facility, filed a petition for a writ of 19 habeas corpus on June 20, 2013. 20 Clerk notified Petitioner that he had not filed an application to 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Doc. #1. On the same day, the proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) with his petition and that he must pay the $5.00 filing fee or complete and sign the Court’s IFP application with a Certificate of Funds in Prisoner’s Account form. Doc. #2. The Clerk enclosed both forms and a return envelope with the notice. Doc. #2. The Clerk’s notice included a warning indicating that, if Petitioner did not respond within twenty-eight (28) days from the filing date stamped on the notice, his action 1 would be dismissed, the file closed and the entire filing fee will 2 become due immediately. 3 The deadline to file the IFP application or pay the $5,00 4 fee has passed and Petitioner has not filed the application, paid 5 the fee or communicated with the Court in any manner. 6 therefore, is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to file an IFP 7 application or pay the filing fee. 8 9 The action, The Clerk shall terminate all pending motions as moot and close the file. 10 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 13 14 DATED 07/30/2013 THELTON E. HENDERSON United States District Judge 15 16 17 18 19 G:\PRO-SE\TEH\HC.13\Rivera 13-2851 Dis No IFP.wpd 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?