Octavian Marks LLC v. Marka Shipping LTD

Filing 20

Order by Hon. Samuel Conti granting 19 Stipulation.(sclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/28/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 JOHN D. GIFFIN, CASB No. 89608 JESSICA LUHRS, CASB No. 284846 KEESAL, YOUNG & LOGAN A Professional Corporation 450 Pacific Avenue San Francisco, CA 94133 Telephone: (415) 398-6000 Facsimile: (415) 981-0136 5 Attorneys for Interested Party PANAMAX INTERNATIONAL (P.I.) 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 OCTAVIAN MARKA LLC, Plaintiff, 12 13 vs. 15 MARKA SHIPPING LTD., in personam, and M/T MARKA, IMO no. 9512484, her engines, tackle, gear and appurtenances, in rem, 16 Defendants. 14 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CV-13-2863-SC STIPULATED APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER; [PROPOSED] ORDER [RESTRICTED APPEARANCE PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. SUPPLEMENTAL ADMIRALTY RULE E(8)] Interested Party PANAMAX INTERNATIONAL (P.I.) (“PANAMAX”) and Plaintiff OCTAVIAN MARKA LLC (“OCTAVIAN”) (collectively, “the Parties”), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, OCTAVIAN is the owner of the vessel M/T MARKA (IMO NO. 9512484) (“M/T MARKA”); WHEREAS, on June 20, 2013 OCTAVIAN filed a Verified Complaint seeking a Warrant of Arrest against the M/T MARKA pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions, Rule D; WHEREAS, on June 20, 2013, this Court issued a Warrant of Arrest pursuant to which the M/T MARKA was arrested; WHEREAS, Defendant MARKA SHIPPING LTD. is the bareboat charterer of the M/T MARKA and has not appeared in this action or otherwise made a claim; -1- KYL_SF602857 STIPULATED APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER; [PROPOSED] ORDER - Case No. CV-13-2863-SC 1 WHEREAS, on June 25, 2013, Interested Party PANAMAX made a special appearance 2 by filing a Verified Statement of Interest stating that it is, among other things, the time-charterer of the 3 M/T MARKA and owner of bunker fuel aboard the vessel; and 4 WHEREAS, the Parties wish to commission a joint bunker survey in order to 5 determine the precise amount of fuel aboard the M/T MARKA and the amount consumed during its 6 arrest (the “Survey”), and seek an Order from the Court permitting a surveyor to attend onboard the 7 M/T MARKA to conduct the Survey with the cost split evenly between the Parties. The purpose of 8 the Survey is to determine quantity only, and no bunkers or other materials will be removed from the 9 vessel. 10 IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED. 11 12 13 DATED: June 27, 2013 /s/ Jessica Luhrs _________________________ JOHN D. GIFFIN JESSICA LUHRS KEESAL, YOUNG & LOGAN Attorneys for Interested Party PANAMAX INTERNATIONAL (P.I.) DATED June 27, 2013 /s/ Rupert P. Hansen_______________________ RUPERT P. HANSEN COX, WOOTTON, GRIFFIN, HANSEN & POULOS LLP Attorney for Plaintiff OCTAVIAN MARKA LLC 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Filer's Attestation: Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1 (i)(3) regarding signatures, Jessica Luhrs 24 hereby attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained. 25 26 27 28 -2- KYL_SF602857 STIPULATED APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER; [PROPOSED] ORDER - Case No. CV-13-2863-SC 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 3 Based on the foregoing Stipulation and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 4 5 1. At their mutual expense, PANAMAX INTERNATIONAL (P.I.) and OCTAVIAN 6 MARKA LLC may commission a joint bunker survey to determine the precise amount of 7 fuel aboard the M/T MARKA and the amount consumed during its arrest (the “Survey”). 8 2. A surveyor will be permitted to attend onboard the M/T MARKA to conduct the Survey. 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 12 13 14 15 June 28, 2013 DATED: _____________ ______________________________________ THE HONORABLE SAMUEL CONTI U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3- KYL_SF602857 STIPULATED APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER; [PROPOSED] ORDER - Case No. CV-13-2863-SC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?