Octavian Marks LLC v. Marka Shipping LTD
Filing
20
Order by Hon. Samuel Conti granting 19 Stipulation.(sclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/28/2013)
1
2
3
4
JOHN D. GIFFIN, CASB No. 89608
JESSICA LUHRS, CASB No. 284846
KEESAL, YOUNG & LOGAN
A Professional Corporation
450 Pacific Avenue
San Francisco, CA 94133
Telephone:
(415) 398-6000
Facsimile:
(415) 981-0136
5
Attorneys for Interested Party PANAMAX INTERNATIONAL (P.I.)
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
OCTAVIAN MARKA LLC,
Plaintiff,
12
13
vs.
15
MARKA SHIPPING LTD., in personam, and
M/T MARKA, IMO no. 9512484, her engines,
tackle, gear and appurtenances, in rem,
16
Defendants.
14
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. CV-13-2863-SC
STIPULATED APPLICATION FOR AN
ORDER; [PROPOSED] ORDER
[RESTRICTED APPEARANCE PURSUANT
TO F.R.C.P. SUPPLEMENTAL
ADMIRALTY RULE E(8)]
Interested Party PANAMAX INTERNATIONAL (P.I.) (“PANAMAX”) and Plaintiff
OCTAVIAN MARKA LLC (“OCTAVIAN”) (collectively, “the Parties”), by and through their
respective counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:
WHEREAS, OCTAVIAN is the owner of the vessel M/T MARKA (IMO NO.
9512484) (“M/T MARKA”);
WHEREAS, on June 20, 2013 OCTAVIAN filed a Verified Complaint seeking a
Warrant of Arrest against the M/T MARKA pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,
Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions, Rule D;
WHEREAS, on June 20, 2013, this Court issued a Warrant of Arrest pursuant to which
the M/T MARKA was arrested;
WHEREAS, Defendant MARKA SHIPPING LTD. is the bareboat charterer of the M/T
MARKA and has not appeared in this action or otherwise made a claim;
-1-
KYL_SF602857
STIPULATED APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER; [PROPOSED] ORDER - Case No. CV-13-2863-SC
1
WHEREAS, on June 25, 2013, Interested Party PANAMAX made a special appearance
2
by filing a Verified Statement of Interest stating that it is, among other things, the time-charterer of the
3
M/T MARKA and owner of bunker fuel aboard the vessel; and
4
WHEREAS, the Parties wish to commission a joint bunker survey in order to
5
determine the precise amount of fuel aboard the M/T MARKA and the amount consumed during its
6
arrest (the “Survey”), and seek an Order from the Court permitting a surveyor to attend onboard the
7
M/T MARKA to conduct the Survey with the cost split evenly between the Parties. The purpose of
8
the Survey is to determine quantity only, and no bunkers or other materials will be removed from the
9
vessel.
10
IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED.
11
12
13
DATED: June 27, 2013
/s/ Jessica Luhrs _________________________
JOHN D. GIFFIN
JESSICA LUHRS
KEESAL, YOUNG & LOGAN
Attorneys for Interested Party PANAMAX
INTERNATIONAL (P.I.)
DATED June 27, 2013
/s/ Rupert P. Hansen_______________________
RUPERT P. HANSEN
COX, WOOTTON, GRIFFIN, HANSEN &
POULOS LLP
Attorney for Plaintiff OCTAVIAN MARKA LLC
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Filer's Attestation: Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1 (i)(3) regarding signatures, Jessica Luhrs
24
hereby attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained.
25
26
27
28
-2-
KYL_SF602857
STIPULATED APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER; [PROPOSED] ORDER - Case No. CV-13-2863-SC
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
2
3
Based on the foregoing Stipulation and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED
THAT:
4
5
1. At their mutual expense, PANAMAX INTERNATIONAL (P.I.) and OCTAVIAN
6
MARKA LLC may commission a joint bunker survey to determine the precise amount of
7
fuel aboard the M/T MARKA and the amount consumed during its arrest (the “Survey”).
8
2. A surveyor will be permitted to attend onboard the M/T MARKA to conduct the Survey.
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
12
13
14
15
June 28, 2013
DATED: _____________
______________________________________
THE HONORABLE SAMUEL CONTI
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
KYL_SF602857
STIPULATED APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER; [PROPOSED] ORDER - Case No. CV-13-2863-SC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?